Confused between minCir and shape adaptive <lower bound>

From: johngibson1541@yahoo.com
Date: Sat Oct 21 2006 - 00:56:41 ART

• Next message: Schulz, Dave: "RE: Frame Relay Issues (IE WB vol 1 version 3.00 LAB 5)"
• Previous message: Duane Fletcher: "Re: Frame Relay Issues (IE WB vol 1 version 3.00 LAB 5)"
• Next in thread: Victor Cappuccio: "RE: Confused between minCir and shape adaptive <lower bound>"
• Maybe reply: Victor Cappuccio: "RE: Confused between minCir and shape adaptive <lower bound>"
• Maybe reply: Michael Zuo: "RE: Confused between minCir and shape adaptive <lower bound>"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Appreciate any reply. I am reading univercd and MQC frame-relay shaping seem to only offer the "shape adaptive <lower bound>" that resembles the minCir concept.

Also I am not sure if traffic arrives at the bandwidth queue first or shaping queue first.

John

• Next message: Schulz, Dave: "RE: Frame Relay Issues (IE WB vol 1 version 3.00 LAB 5)"
• Previous message: Duane Fletcher: "Re: Frame Relay Issues (IE WB vol 1 version 3.00 LAB 5)"
• Next in thread: Victor Cappuccio: "RE: Confused between minCir and shape adaptive <lower bound>"
• Maybe reply: Victor Cappuccio: "RE: Confused between minCir and shape adaptive <lower bound>"
• Maybe reply: Michael Zuo: "RE: Confused between minCir and shape adaptive <lower bound>"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Nov 01 2006 - 07:29:06 ART