From: Victor Cappuccio (cvictor@protokolgroup.com)
Date: Sat Oct 21 2006 - 01:57:33 ART
Hi,
I see this in this way: What is the mincir value used for?
To ADAPT the traffic SHAPE by explicit congestion notification.
My Understanding is that both are the same, but one is more newer than the
other..
For the other question, a picture is better than 1 thousand words
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/cat4224/sw_confg/traffic
.htm#10508
Mis 2 Centavos.
Victor.-
-----Mensaje original-----
De: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] En nombre de
johngibson1541@yahoo.com
Enviado el: Viernes, 20 de Octubre de 2006 11:57 p.m.
Para: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Asunto: Confused between minCir and shape adaptive <lower bound>
Appreciate any reply. I am reading univercd and MQC frame-relay shaping seem
to only offer the "shape adaptive <lower bound>" that resembles the minCir
concept.
Also I am not sure if traffic arrives at the bandwidth queue first or
shaping queue first.
John
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Nov 01 2006 - 07:29:06 ART