From: Michael Zuo (mzuo@ixiacom.com)
Date: Mon Oct 30 2006 - 05:35:13 ART
What if "frame-relay mincir" and "shape adaptive" (as "service-policy"
under map-class) are both configured, which take precedence?
Are the two commands doing exact same thing under the cover?
thanks
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Victor Cappuccio
Sent: Friday, October 20, 2006 9:58 PM
To: johngibson1541@yahoo.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: Confused between minCir and shape adaptive <lower bound>
Hi,
I see this in this way: What is the mincir value used for?
To ADAPT the traffic SHAPE by explicit congestion notification.
My Understanding is that both are the same, but one is more newer than
the
other..
For the other question, a picture is better than 1 thousand words
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/cat4224/sw_confg/tra
ffic
.htm#10508
Mis 2 Centavos.
Victor.-
-----Mensaje original-----
De: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] En nombre de
johngibson1541@yahoo.com
Enviado el: Viernes, 20 de Octubre de 2006 11:57 p.m.
Para: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Asunto: Confused between minCir and shape adaptive <lower bound>
Appreciate any reply. I am reading univercd and MQC frame-relay shaping
seem
to only offer the "shape adaptive <lower bound>" that resembles the
minCir
concept.
Also I am not sure if traffic arrives at the bandwidth queue first or
shaping queue first.
John
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Nov 01 2006 - 07:29:07 ART