From: CharlesB (cbalik@adelphia.net)
Date: Sun Oct 15 2006 - 14:10:32 ART
Sorry, I guess I was not clear on my email. ( After a cup of morning coffee,
thinks get more clear)
If the task says "do not use vtp pruning" then the method of manual
configuration could be the way. In that case the answer to your question is
yes. The manually removing the VLANs is the alternative to pruning but
painful and you can make mistakes. But when I reread the task it is clear
that they are asking for the VTP pruning indicated in the first sentence of
the task.
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
CharlesB
Sent: Sunday, October 15, 2006 9:05 AM
To: Metin; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: Vol1 LAb 4 task 1.3
I do not think so. I went through the same process of thinking when I did
this lab.
The VTP pruning message/decision comes from the other end of the neighbor. A
switch will tell the other switch if the vlan can be pruned or not. In the
static removal of the vlan, it is kind of one sided decision and this may
break the requirement. Basically, in this task they are asking VTP methods
to be understood.
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of Metin
Sent: Sunday, October 15, 2006 1:52 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Vol1 LAb 4 task 1.3
Hi all,
under the trun interfaces, switchport allowed vlan 8 on Fa0/13 and
switchport allowed vlan except 8 on Fa0/14 and 15.
Is this command can be alternative to vt pruning vlan command?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Nov 01 2006 - 07:29:05 ART