pix 506, 506E, or 520
From: marc fernandez (mag08036@yahoo.com)
Date: Fri Aug 11 2006 - 02:36:51 ART
- Next message: Kulcsár: "RE: regexp - difference between ? and *"
- Previous message: lenny lim: "PIM and other uncertainties"
- Next in thread: Dustin H: "Re: pix 506, 506E, or 520"
- Maybe reply: Dustin H: "Re: pix 506, 506E, or 520"
- Maybe reply: Vazman: "Re: pix 506, 506E, or 520"
- Maybe reply: Edouard Zorrilla: "Re: pix 506, 506E, or 520"
- Maybe reply: Edouard Zorrilla: "Re: pix 506, 506E, or 520"
- Maybe reply: Guyler, Rik: "RE: pix 506, 506E, or 520"
- Maybe reply: Guyler, Rik: "RE: pix 506, 506E, or 520"
- Maybe reply: marc fernandez: "Re: pix 506, 506E, or 520"
- Maybe reply: Thomas E. Cook: "RE: pix 506, 506E, or 520"
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
[ attachment ]
Still trying to decide on the pix for my lab. As I am
seeing these choices available, will there be any
problem using a pix 520 on my lab for practice and
will it support the same os on the lab? With an
unrestricted license. Will I be able to do most of the
scenarios on the security blue prin? Should I just go
with the 506 or 506E? Are there crutial differences?
Your help is appreciated.
-marc
- Next message: Kulcsár: "RE: regexp - difference between ? and *"
- Previous message: lenny lim: "PIM and other uncertainties"
- Next in thread: Dustin H: "Re: pix 506, 506E, or 520"
- Maybe reply: Dustin H: "Re: pix 506, 506E, or 520"
- Maybe reply: Vazman: "Re: pix 506, 506E, or 520"
- Maybe reply: Edouard Zorrilla: "Re: pix 506, 506E, or 520"
- Maybe reply: Edouard Zorrilla: "Re: pix 506, 506E, or 520"
- Maybe reply: Guyler, Rik: "RE: pix 506, 506E, or 520"
- Maybe reply: Guyler, Rik: "RE: pix 506, 506E, or 520"
- Maybe reply: marc fernandez: "Re: pix 506, 506E, or 520"
- Maybe reply: Thomas E. Cook: "RE: pix 506, 506E, or 520"
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
[ attachment ]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4
: Fri Sep 01 2006 - 15:41:56 ART