From: Jian Gu (guxiaojian@gmail.com)
Date: Tue Mar 21 2006 - 19:54:28 GMT-3
Could it be that on R3, R4, 54.1.1.254 is not in the routing table?
On 3/21/06, John Matus <John.Matus@tokiom.com> wrote:
>
> R3
> outer bgp 100
> no synchronization
> bgp log-neighbor-changes
> neighbor 183.1.0.5 remote-as 100
> neighbor 183.1.123.2 remote-as 200
> neighbor 204.12.1.254 remote-as 54
> auto-summary
>
>
> r4#sh run | begin bgp
> router bgp 100
> no synchronization
> bgp log-neighbor-changes
> neighbor 150.1.5.5 remote-as 100
> neighbor 150.1.5.5 update-source Loopback0
> no auto-summary
>
> r5#sh run | begin bgp
> router bgp 100
> no synchronization
> bgp log-neighbor-changes
> neighbor 150.1.4.4 remote-as 100
> neighbor 150.1.4.4 update-source Loopback0
> neighbor 150.1.4.4 route-reflector-client
> neighbor 150.1.6.6 remote-as 100
> neighbor 150.1.6.6 update-source Loopback0
> neighbor 150.1.6.6 route-reflector-client
> neighbor 183.1.0.3 remote-as 100
> neighbor 183.1.0.3 route-reflector-client
> neighbor 183.1.58.8 remote-as 200
> auto-summary
>
>
> r6#sh run | begin bgp
> router bgp 100
> no synchronization
> bgp log-neighbor-changes
> neighbor 54.1.1.254 remote-as 54
> neighbor 54.1.1.254 route-map localpref in
> neighbor 150.1.5.5 remote-as 100
> neighbor 150.1.5.5 update-source Loopback0
> auto-summary
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> John D. Matus
> Technical Support / PAS
> Fujitsu Consulting
> 626-568-7716
> John.Matus@tokiom.com
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 01 2006 - 10:07:39 GMT-3