From: Schulz, Dave (DSchulz@dpsciences.com)
Date: Tue Mar 21 2006 - 20:06:19 GMT-3
But synchronization is not enabled, so it shouldn't have to be in the
RIB. At least, that is my understanding of synchronization.
Dave Schulz,
Email: dschulz@dpsciences.com <mailto:dschulz@dpsciences.com%20>
________________________________
From: Jian Gu [mailto:guxiaojian@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2006 5:54 PM
To: John Matus
Cc: Schulz, Dave; ccielab@groupstudy.com; nobody@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: bgp frustration IE lab 1
Could it be that on R3, R4, 54.1.1.254 is not in the routing table?
On 3/21/06, John Matus < John.Matus@tokiom.com
<mailto:John.Matus@tokiom.com> > wrote:
R3
outer bgp 100
no synchronization
bgp log-neighbor-changes
neighbor 183.1.0.5 remote-as 100
neighbor 183.1.123.2 remote-as 200
neighbor 204.12.1.254 remote-as 54
auto-summary
r4#sh run | begin bgp
router bgp 100
no synchronization
bgp log-neighbor-changes
neighbor 150.1.5.5 remote-as 100
neighbor 150.1.5.5 update-source Loopback0
no auto-summary
r5#sh run | begin bgp
router bgp 100
no synchronization
bgp log-neighbor-changes
neighbor 150.1.4.4 remote-as 100
neighbor 150.1.4.4 update-source Loopback0
neighbor 150.1.4.4 route-reflector-client
neighbor 150.1.6.6 remote-as 100
neighbor 150.1.6.6 update-source Loopback0
neighbor 150.1.6.6 route-reflector-client
neighbor 183.1.0.3 remote-as 100
neighbor 183.1.0.3 route-reflector-client
neighbor 183.1.58.8 remote-as 200
auto-summary
r6#sh run | begin bgp
router bgp 100
no synchronization
bgp log-neighbor-changes
neighbor 54.1.1.254 remote-as 54
neighbor 54.1.1.254 route-map localpref in
neighbor 150.1.5.5 remote-as 100
neighbor 150.1.5.5 update-source Loopback0
auto-summary
Regards,
John D. Matus
Technical Support / PAS
Fujitsu Consulting
626-568-7716
John.Matus@tokiom.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 01 2006 - 10:07:39 GMT-3