From: Godswill Oletu (oletu@inbox.lv)
Date: Mon Nov 14 2005 - 01:21:51 GMT-3
Steven,
I do not see the usefulness of the bridge-group command under a L2 port, the
port is alreading bridging all protocols by virtual of its layer 2 status.
You will only need the command on a L3 capable ports/interfaces.
If you want to change the default bridging behaviour of the port, use the
'no switchport' command and it will now be capable of either bridging or
routing or both depending on your configurations, then the 'bridge-group'
command will be effective.
The 'bridge-group' command will not show up as a configurable option under
the switchport interface until the 'no switchport' command is enabled.
Rack1SW2(config)#int fa0/11
Rack1SW2(config-if)#bridge-group ?
% Unrecognized command
Rack1SW2(config-if)#bridge-group ?
% Unrecognized command
Rack1SW2(config-if)#no switchport
Rack1SW2(config-if)#bridge-group ?
<1-255> Assign an interface to a Bridge Group.
Rack1SW2(config-if)#bridge-group 1
Rack1SW2(config-if)#
HTH
Godswill Oletu
----- Original Message -----
From: "steven richards" <ccie_2005@hotmail.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Monday, November 14, 2005 8:21 PM
Subject: Another fallback bridging question
> If you have an SVI interface lets say for vlan 5. And a couple switch
ports
> in vlan 5. If you apply the bridge group command to the SVI interface to
> bridge the non routable traffic between vlan 5 and another vlan or routed
> port will you also need to apply the bridge-group command on the switch
> ports that are in vlan 5 as well ?
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's FREE!
> http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Dec 01 2005 - 09:12:06 GMT-3