From: Daniel Berlinski (Daniel.Berlinski@telecom.co.nz)
Date: Tue Nov 15 2005 - 01:12:15 GMT-3
Sorry guys. Had a typo on that one. It should read that I can't use suppress-map and I can't use summary-only keyword
cheers
________________________________
From: Chris Lewis [mailto:chrlewiscsco@yahoo.com]
Sent: Tue 15/11/2005 5:10 p.m.
To: Daniel Berlinski; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: BGP question
how about using the suppress-map on the aggregate to get rid of unwanted routes?
Daniel Berlinski <Daniel.Berlinski@telecom.co.nz> wrote:
Hi
Please consider the following scenario:
Backbone --- R3 --- R1
I'm summarizing incoming routes from Backbone in R3. I need to see in R1 only the summary route. I'm not permitted to use unsuppress-map or summary-only keyword with aggregate-address in R3. My solution needs to be flexible with future additional routes coming from backbone:
I've tried different things (unsuppress maps and prefix-list which is not very scalable) and now I'm feeling totally out of track. Would not like to be given the straight answer but just a hint to put me in the right direction would help in this one.
Cheers
This communication, including any attachments, is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you should not read it - please contact me immediately, destroy it, and do not copy or use any part of this communication or disclose anything about it. Thank you. Please note that this communication does not designate an information system for the purposes of the Electronic Transactions Act 2002.
_______________________________________________________________________
Subscription information may be found at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Dec 01 2005 - 09:12:06 GMT-3