Re: FRTS vs MQC

From: gladston@br.ibm.com
Date: Mon May 02 2005 - 10:12:35 GMT-3

• Next message: Bob Sinclair: "Re: FRTS vs MQC"
• Previous message: simon hart: "RE: SNMP enable traps.."
• Next in thread: Bob Sinclair: "Re: FRTS vs MQC"
• Maybe reply: Bob Sinclair: "Re: FRTS vs MQC"
• Maybe reply: gladston@br.ibm.com: "Re: FRTS vs MQC"
• Maybe reply: gladston@br.ibm.com: "Re: FRTS vs MQC"
• Maybe reply: san: "Re: FRTS vs MQC"
• Maybe reply: Bob Sinclair: "Re: FRTS vs MQC"
• Maybe reply: gladston@br.ibm.com: "Re: FRTS vs MQC"
• Maybe reply: sumit.kumar@comcast.net: "Re: FRTS vs MQC"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi,

I would list these:

CB shaping does not support FRF.12 fragmentation on Frame Relay subinterfaces and can not be enabled per-VC on multipoint Frame Relay.

From Wendell.

Make sense?

• Next message: Bob Sinclair: "Re: FRTS vs MQC"
• Previous message: simon hart: "RE: SNMP enable traps.."
• Next in thread: Bob Sinclair: "Re: FRTS vs MQC"
• Maybe reply: Bob Sinclair: "Re: FRTS vs MQC"
• Maybe reply: gladston@br.ibm.com: "Re: FRTS vs MQC"
• Maybe reply: gladston@br.ibm.com: "Re: FRTS vs MQC"
• Maybe reply: san: "Re: FRTS vs MQC"
• Maybe reply: Bob Sinclair: "Re: FRTS vs MQC"
• Maybe reply: gladston@br.ibm.com: "Re: FRTS vs MQC"
• Maybe reply: sumit.kumar@comcast.net: "Re: FRTS vs MQC"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jun 03 2005 - 10:11:56 GMT-3