From: Bob Sinclair (bsinclair@netmasterclass.net)
Date: Mon May 02 2005 - 11:12:02 GMT-3
Gladston,
I will leave Odom's claim regarding FRF.12 to others, but for some reason Odom
continues to claim something that is obviously not true: In both editions
Odom claims you cannot enable MQC- based shaping on frame-relay PVCs, but you
most certainly can. Here is a link to accurate documentation. And below is a
working config demonstrating per-PVC MQC-based shaping.
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122newft/122t
/122t13/frqosmqc.htm
map-class frame-relay SHAPE
service-policy output MQC-POLICY
policy-map MQC-POLICY
class class-default
shape average 10000 8000 0
interface Serial1/0.1 multipoint
bandwidth 64
ip address 172.16.7.1 255.255.255.0
frame-relay map ip 172.16.7.2 212 broadcast
frame-relay map ip 172.16.7.3 213 broadcast
frame-relay interface-dlci 212
class SHAPE
R1#sh policy-map int
Serial1/0.1: DLCI 212 -
Service-policy output: MQC-POLICY
Class-map: class-default (match-any)
7864 packets, 819162 bytes
5 minute offered rate 6000 bps, drop rate 0 bps
Match: any
Traffic Shaping
Target/Average Byte Sustain Excess Interval Increment
Rate Limit bits/int bits/int (ms) (bytes)
10000/10000 1000 8000 0 800 1000
Adapt Queue Packets Bytes Packets Bytes Shaping
Active Depth Delayed Delayed Active
- 0 7864 819162 352 37444 no
R1#
HTH,
Bob Sinclair
CCIE #10427, CCSI 30427, CISSP
www.netmasterclass.net
----- Original Message -----
From: gladston@br.ibm.com
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Sent: Monday, May 02, 2005 9:12 AM
Subject: Re: FRTS vs MQC
Hi,
I would list these:
CB shaping does not support FRF.12 fragmentation on Frame Relay
subinterfaces and can not be enabled per-VC on multipoint Frame Relay.
From Wendell.
Make sense?
_______________________________________________________________________
Subscription information may be found at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jun 03 2005 - 10:11:56 GMT-3