Re: FRTS vs MQC

From: gladston@br.ibm.com
Date: Mon May 02 2005 - 12:10:00 GMT-3


Thanks a Lot Bob,

Cordially,
------------------------------------------------------------------
 Gladston

"Bob Sinclair" <bsinclair@netmasterclass.net>
02/05/2005 11:12

To
Alaerte Gladston Vidali/Brazil/IBM@IBMBR, <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
cc

Subject
Re: FRTS vs MQC

Gladston,
 
I will leave Odom's claim regarding FRF.12 to others, but for some reason
Odom continues to claim something that is obviously not true: In both
editions Odom claims you cannot enable MQC- based shaping on frame-relay
PVCs, but you most certainly can. Here is a link to accurate
documentation. And below is a working config demonstrating per-PVC
MQC-based shaping.
 
 
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122newft/122t/122t13/frqosmqc.htm
 
map-class frame-relay SHAPE
 service-policy output MQC-POLICY
 
 policy-map MQC-POLICY
  class class-default
   shape average 10000 8000 0
 
interface Serial1/0.1 multipoint
 bandwidth 64
 ip address 172.16.7.1 255.255.255.0
 frame-relay map ip 172.16.7.2 212 broadcast
 frame-relay map ip 172.16.7.3 213 broadcast
 frame-relay interface-dlci 212
  class SHAPE
 
R1#sh policy-map int
 Serial1/0.1: DLCI 212 -
 
  Service-policy output: MQC-POLICY
 
    Class-map: class-default (match-any)
      7864 packets, 819162 bytes
      5 minute offered rate 6000 bps, drop rate 0 bps
      Match: any
      Traffic Shaping
            Target/Average Byte Sustain Excess Interval
Increment
              Rate Limit bits/int bits/int (ms)
(bytes)
             10000/10000 1000 8000 0 800
1000
 
         Adapt Queue Packets Bytes Packets Bytes Shaping
        Active Depth Delayed Delayed Active
         - 0 7864 819162 352 37444 no
R1#
 
HTH,
 
Bob Sinclair
CCIE #10427, CCSI 30427, CISSP
www.netmasterclass.net
----- Original Message -----
From: gladston@br.ibm.com
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Sent: Monday, May 02, 2005 9:12 AM
Subject: Re: FRTS vs MQC

Hi,

I would list these:

CB shaping does not support FRF.12 fragmentation on Frame Relay
subinterfaces and can not be enabled per-VC on multipoint Frame Relay.

From Wendell.

Make sense?



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jun 03 2005 - 10:11:56 GMT-3