From: De Witt, Duane (duane.dewitt@siemens.com)
Date: Wed Nov 10 2004 - 09:54:09 GMT-3
Hi
You are correct in your answer. If the lab requires RIPV2 without
multicast or unicast this would be the command to use.
Regards
Duane
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
bi.s
Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2004 2:44 PM
To: Hai Minh
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: a question about RIPv2
Hai Minh wrote:
> Hi groups,
>
> I use RIPv2, and my question is :
> What is the different between "ip rip v2-broadcast" and "ip rip send
version
> 1" ?
> I think both of them will send RIP packets to the address
255.255.255.255.
> Why do they need the "ip rip v2-broadcast" command ?
>
hi,
my guess would be, that with send/receive version 1 you send actually
RIPv1 packets. So no authentication etc. just plain old RIPv1.
With the command v2-broadcast you send RIPv2 packets to broadcast
instead of multicast inlcuding all those nice RIPv2 features like
authentication and VLSM etc.
somebody correct me if I am wrong.
hth
-b
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Dec 02 2004 - 06:57:41 GMT-3