Re: a question about RIPv2

From: Hai Minh (minh@ipmac.com.vn)
Date: Wed Nov 10 2004 - 09:59:21 GMT-3


Ah, DocCD doesn't talk clear about 2 these commnads.
Thanks for your help.

Hai Minh

----- Original Message -----
From: "Hoonpongsimanont, Chalermchai"
<chalermchai.hoonpongsimanont@atosorigin.com>
To: "Hai Minh" <minh@ipmac.com.vn>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2004 7:46 PM
Subject: RE: a question about RIPv2

> Hi,
>
> "ip rip v2-broadcast" will send out *version 2* update to 255.255.255.255.
> We still have all version 2 features like subnet going along with routing
> update, route authentication, route tagging.
>
> "ip rip send version 1" will send out *version 1* update also to
> 255.255.255.255.
>
> Hope this help,
> David
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hai Minh [mailto:minh@ipmac.com.vn]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2004 7:09 PM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: a question about RIPv2
>
> Hi groups,
>
> I use RIPv2, and my question is :
> What is the different between "ip rip v2-broadcast" and "ip rip send
version
> 1" ?
> I think both of them will send RIP packets to the address 255.255.255.255.
> Why do they need the "ip rip v2-broadcast" command ?
>
> Thanks
> Hai Minh.
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Dec 02 2004 - 06:57:41 GMT-3