Access-list clarification

From: Cisco Net (network.cisco@gmail.com)
Date: Tue Oct 19 2004 - 01:30:51 GMT-3

• Next message: venkat garigipati: "Question on BGP & RIP"
• Previous message: Swaroop Potdar: "RE: Cisco Asset Labs"
• Next in thread: Nico van Niekerk: "RE: Access-list clarification"
• Maybe reply: Nico van Niekerk: "RE: Access-list clarification"
• Maybe reply: Cisco Net: "Re: Access-list clarification"
• Maybe reply: Nico van Niekerk: "RE: Access-list clarification"
• Maybe reply: Kian Wah, Lai: "RE: Access-list clarification"
• Maybe reply: Carlos G Mendioroz: "Re: Access-list clarification"
• Maybe reply: Edwards, Andrew M: "RE: Access-list clarification"
• Maybe reply: ccie2be: "Re: Access-list clarification"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi
How to write an acl for the following,
145.X.0.0 /16 where as second octet can be any number

Got confused..

145.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 will not match the mask.

Is it,

145.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 host 255.255.0.0 ???

Please clarify....
Regards
Cert

• Next message: venkat garigipati: "Question on BGP & RIP"
• Previous message: Swaroop Potdar: "RE: Cisco Asset Labs"
• Next in thread: Nico van Niekerk: "RE: Access-list clarification"
• Maybe reply: Nico van Niekerk: "RE: Access-list clarification"
• Maybe reply: Cisco Net: "Re: Access-list clarification"
• Maybe reply: Nico van Niekerk: "RE: Access-list clarification"
• Maybe reply: Kian Wah, Lai: "RE: Access-list clarification"
• Maybe reply: Carlos G Mendioroz: "Re: Access-list clarification"
• Maybe reply: Edwards, Andrew M: "RE: Access-list clarification"
• Maybe reply: ccie2be: "Re: Access-list clarification"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Nov 06 2004 - 17:11:49 GMT-3