From: gladston@br.ibm.com
Date: Tue Aug 10 2004 - 11:21:06 GMT-3
Thanks,
If I undertood it right it is not possible to limit and give it a high priority using CBWFQ on the same interface.
On the other hand, I could do it using CAR.
For example:
access-list 102 permit tcp any any eq 80
!
access-list 103 permit tcp any any eq 23
interface seria 0
rate-limit output access-group 102 1000000 250000 350000 conform-action
set-dscp-transmit 46 exceed-action set-dscp-transmit 46
rate-limit output access-group 103 1000000 250000 350000 conform-action set-dscp-transmit 0 exceed-action set-dscp-transmit 0
fair-queue
!
end
Is this assumption correct?
And what would happen if the interface was Ethernet. Would it be possible to priorize the traffic?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Sep 03 2004 - 07:02:36 GMT-3