From: asadovnikov (asadovnikov@comcast.net)
Date: Tue Aug 10 2004 - 11:58:52 GMT-3
You are getting it.
Normally one would use marking by CAR or CB marking on inbound and then use
CBWFQ or FWQ on outbound. CBWFQ provides lot more flexibility on traffic
management of a kind you appear to be looking for; it as well uses modular
configuration which will allow you to combine queuing (such as bandwidth
command) and policing, should you need to. CAR is a legacy policing/marking
tool and you should try to use CB marking/policing more.
Best regards,
Alexei
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
gladston@br.ibm.com
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 10:31 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Re: RE: RE: QoS
Sorry,
I realize that I must be missing the basic here (after Alexei's feedback)
CAR does not queue so it is not possible to priorize one traffic over
another.
The best it can do on the output of an interface is police and mark.
On the other hand, as Brian said, it is possible to use CAR on the input
interface and priorize on the output interface.
Is that right?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Sep 03 2004 - 07:02:36 GMT-3