IS-IS and lack of CLNS addressing

From: marc van hoof (mvh@marcvanhoof.com)
Date: Mon Jul 26 2004 - 19:50:20 GMT-3

Next message: Scott Morris: "RE: IS-IS and lack of CLNS addressing"
Previous message: James: "Re: Last Minute Tips - Technical or Non-technical"
Next in thread: Scott Morris: "RE: IS-IS and lack of CLNS addressing"
Maybe reply: Scott Morris: "RE: IS-IS and lack of CLNS addressing"
Maybe reply: john matijevic: "RE: IS-IS and lack of CLNS addressing"
Maybe reply: marc van hoof: "RE: IS-IS and lack of CLNS addressing"
Maybe reply: john matijevic: "RE: IS-IS and lack of CLNS addressing"
Maybe reply: James: "Re: IS-IS and lack of CLNS addressing"
Maybe reply: Scott Morris: "RE: IS-IS and lack of CLNS addressing"
Maybe reply: Brian McGahan: "RE: IS-IS and lack of CLNS addressing"
Maybe reply: marc van hoof: "RE: IS-IS and lack of CLNS addressing"
Maybe reply: Brian McGahan: "RE: IS-IS and lack of CLNS addressing"
Maybe reply: Scott Morris: "RE: IS-IS and lack of CLNS addressing"
Maybe reply: James: "Re: IS-IS and lack of CLNS addressing"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hey all,

just a quick intro and question...

firstly, i'm marc from melbourne, australia - scheduled to do my first
lab attempt on 26th august..... (fingers crossed)

secondly, the lab says that they will not test you on CLNS but they will
test you on both ATM and IS-IS... does this mean that all clns addresses
necessary for these technologies will be provided ?

thanks heaps,
-marc.

Next message: Scott Morris: "RE: IS-IS and lack of CLNS addressing"
Previous message: James: "Re: Last Minute Tips - Technical or Non-technical"
Next in thread: Scott Morris: "RE: IS-IS and lack of CLNS addressing"
Maybe reply: Scott Morris: "RE: IS-IS and lack of CLNS addressing"
Maybe reply: john matijevic: "RE: IS-IS and lack of CLNS addressing"
Maybe reply: marc van hoof: "RE: IS-IS and lack of CLNS addressing"
Maybe reply: john matijevic: "RE: IS-IS and lack of CLNS addressing"
Maybe reply: James: "Re: IS-IS and lack of CLNS addressing"
Maybe reply: Scott Morris: "RE: IS-IS and lack of CLNS addressing"
Maybe reply: Brian McGahan: "RE: IS-IS and lack of CLNS addressing"
Maybe reply: marc van hoof: "RE: IS-IS and lack of CLNS addressing"
Maybe reply: Brian McGahan: "RE: IS-IS and lack of CLNS addressing"
Maybe reply: Scott Morris: "RE: IS-IS and lack of CLNS addressing"
Maybe reply: James: "Re: IS-IS and lack of CLNS addressing"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Aug 01 2004 - 10:12:03 GMT-3