Re: IS-IS and lack of CLNS addressing

From: James (james@towardex.com)
Date: Mon Jul 26 2004 - 20:56:47 GMT-3

Next message: Brian Dennis: "RE: keepalive on BRI"
Previous message: john matijevic: "RE: IS-IS and lack of CLNS addressing"
Maybe in reply to: marc van hoof: "IS-IS and lack of CLNS addressing"
Next in thread: Scott Morris: "RE: IS-IS and lack of CLNS addressing"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

> Hey all,
>
> just a quick intro and question...
>
> firstly, i'm marc from melbourne, australia - scheduled to do my first
> lab attempt on 26th august..... (fingers crossed)
>
> secondly, the lab says that they will not test you on CLNS but they will
> test you on both ATM and IS-IS... does this mean that all clns addresses
> necessary for these technologies will be provided ?
>

Just learn how to create ISIS adjacency over ATM interface which should be a
walk in the park.

For example, if this is ATM CLIP interface, you will quicly realize that it is
an IP only interface where CLNS can't create isis adjacency. Think tunnel? :)

etc etc ;)

-J

-- 
James Jun                                            TowardEX Technologies, Inc.
Technical Lead                        Network Design, Consulting, IT Outsourcing
james@towardex.com                  Boston-based Colocation & Bandwidth Services
cell: 1(978)-394-2867           web: http://www.towardex.com , noc: www.twdx.net

Next message: Brian Dennis: "RE: keepalive on BRI"
Previous message: john matijevic: "RE: IS-IS and lack of CLNS addressing"
Maybe in reply to: marc van hoof: "IS-IS and lack of CLNS addressing"
Next in thread: Scott Morris: "RE: IS-IS and lack of CLNS addressing"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Aug 01 2004 - 10:12:04 GMT-3