From: James (james@towardex.com)
Date: Tue Jul 27 2004 - 12:40:23 GMT-3
On Tue, Jul 27, 2004 at 02:18:41PM +1000, marc van hoof wrote:
> Does this mean that, within the lab, NSAP/NET addresses and domain/area
> strings will be supplied for any tasks that require IS-IS or ATM SVC's
> to be configured ?
Yes and no... If no, then they should at least have properly configured their
ATM switch so that you can find out your NSAP prefix automatically via ILMI.
Then you can pick your ESI-addresses from there and confirm it with the switch
for ATM connectivity.
HTH,
-J
>
> regards,
> -marc.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brian McGahan [mailto:bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2004 2:07 PM
> To: john matijevic; marc van hoof; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: IS-IS and lack of CLNS addressing
>
>
> Integrated IS-IS, or IP extensions to IS-IS, is within the scope
> of the lab exam. CLNS routing (i.e. CLNP & CMNP) is not. Although
> IS-IS is part of the CLNS stack, only the portion that relates to IP
> (Integrated IS-IS) is still within the scope of the lab exam.
>
> Also, ATM does not relate to CLNS. Although ATM SVCs use the
> ISO NSAP addressing format, the two technologies are unrelated.
>
> HTH,
>
> Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593
> bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com
>
> Internetwork Expert, Inc.
> http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
> Toll Free: 877-224-8987 x 705
> Outside US: 775-826-4344 x 705
> 24/7 Support: http://forum.internetworkexpert.com
> Live Chat: http://www.internetworkexpert.com/chat/
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
> Of
> > john matijevic
> > Sent: Monday, July 26, 2004 6:53 PM
> > To: 'marc van hoof'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: RE: IS-IS and lack of CLNS addressing
> >
> > Hello Marc,
> > I can see your confusion now after looking at this. I used to use that
> > same document before. But now they have an updated one, as the one
> I've
> > included in my previous post. I would go by the document that I sent
> you
> > earlier. I can see the confusion. I would send an email to Cisco,
> > stating your concern, than maybe they can be more specific in regards
> to
> > the IS-IS protocol. I did study CLNS when I studied the IS-IS
> > technologies, even with the document that you just showed me that said
> > it had been removed.
> >
> > Sincerely,
> >
> > John Matijevic, CCIE #13254, MCSE, CNE, CCEA
> > Network Consultant
> > Hablo Espanol
> > 305-321-6232
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: marc van hoof [mailto:mvh@marcvanhoof.com]
> > Sent: Monday, July 26, 2004 7:43 PM
> > To: 'john matijevic'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: RE: IS-IS and lack of CLNS addressing
> >
> >
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/learning/le3/ccie/rs/preparing_lab_exam.html
> >
> > >
> > The protocols below have been removed from the lab exam content but
> may
> > remain on the Routing and Switching written exam. (For a list of
> topics
> > appearing on the written exam please review the Written Exam
> Blueprint.)
> >
> > LAT
> > DECnet
> > Apollo
> > Banyan VINES
> > ISO CLNS <------------------------------
> > XNS
> > ATM LANE
> > X.25
> > AppleTalk
> > IGRP
> > Token Ring
> > Token Ring Switching
> > IPX
> >
> > Hey John,
> >
> > I was just going by this - am i misunderstanding something ?
> >
> > cheers,
> > -marc.
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: john matijevic [mailto:matijevi@bellsouth.net]
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2004 9:02 AM
> > To: 'marc van hoof'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: RE: IS-IS and lack of CLNS addressing
> >
> >
> > Hi Marc,
> > >From the lab exam blueprint, I could only gather that they will be
> > testing you on IS-IS and ATM. I could not find where it says that it
> > wont test you on CLNS.
> >
> >
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/learning/le3/ccie/rs/lab_exam_blueprint.html
> >
> > Sincerely,
> >
> > John Matijevic, CCIE #13254, MCSE, CNE, CCEA
> > Network Consultant
> > Hablo Espanol
> > 305-321-6232
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
> Of
> > marc van hoof
> > Sent: Monday, July 26, 2004 6:50 PM
> > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: IS-IS and lack of CLNS addressing
> >
> > Hey all,
> >
> > just a quick intro and question...
> >
> > firstly, i'm marc from melbourne, australia - scheduled to do my first
> > lab attempt on 26th august..... (fingers crossed)
> >
> > secondly, the lab says that they will not test you on CLNS but they
> will
> > test you on both ATM and IS-IS... does this mean that all clns
> addresses
> > necessary for these technologies will be provided ?
> >
> > thanks heaps,
> > -marc.
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________________________________
> > Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials
> from:
> > http://shop.groupstudy.com
> >
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________________________________
> > Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials
> from:
> > http://shop.groupstudy.com
> >
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
> http://shop.groupstudy.com
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
-- James Jun TowardEX Technologies, Inc. Technical Lead Network Design, Consulting, IT Outsourcing james@towardex.com Boston-based Colocation & Bandwidth Services cell: 1(978)-394-2867 web: http://www.towardex.com , noc: www.twdx.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Aug 01 2004 - 10:12:04 GMT-3