Dialer load-threshold question

From: folivore (folivore@hotmail.com)
Date: Sat Apr 26 2003 - 00:04:37 GMT-3

• Next message: Charles Church: "RE: DHCP server security"
• Previous message: aansar@sscomp.com.sg: "DHCP server security"
• Next in thread: OhioHondo: "RE: Dialer load-threshold question"
• Maybe reply: OhioHondo: "RE: Dialer load-threshold question"
• Maybe reply: Ram Shummoogum: "RE: Dialer load-threshold question"
• Maybe reply: Niksa Tomulic: "RE: Dialer load-threshold question"
• Maybe reply: OhioHondo: "RE: Dialer load-threshold question"
• Maybe reply: Ram Shummoogum: "RE: Dialer load-threshold question"
• Maybe reply: Mike Williams: "RE: Dialer load-threshold question"
• Maybe reply: Ram Shummoogum: "RE: Dialer load-threshold question"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi, Guys:
If a question states: Bring up both B if the traffic exceed 32k on any
direction.
Which one is the correct answer?
dialer load-threshold 64 either
or dialer load-threshold 128 either

I think the second one is correct but nearly all books give me the first
one. Do we need to calculate the load based on 2B?

Thanks
Jim

• Next message: Charles Church: "RE: DHCP server security"
• Previous message: aansar@sscomp.com.sg: "DHCP server security"
• Next in thread: OhioHondo: "RE: Dialer load-threshold question"
• Maybe reply: OhioHondo: "RE: Dialer load-threshold question"
• Maybe reply: Ram Shummoogum: "RE: Dialer load-threshold question"
• Maybe reply: Niksa Tomulic: "RE: Dialer load-threshold question"
• Maybe reply: OhioHondo: "RE: Dialer load-threshold question"
• Maybe reply: Ram Shummoogum: "RE: Dialer load-threshold question"
• Maybe reply: Mike Williams: "RE: Dialer load-threshold question"
• Maybe reply: Ram Shummoogum: "RE: Dialer load-threshold question"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu May 01 2003 - 13:36:07 GMT-3