From: Ram Shummoogum (rshummoo@ca.ibm.com)
Date: Sat Apr 26 2003 - 14:48:02 GMT-3
I you read properly you will notice that I did not put any unit after the
128. It is not the B/W.
The 128 is a ratio which corresponds to 50% of 255.
"Mike Williams" <ccie2be@swbell.net> on 04/26/2003 12:21:43 PM
To: Ram Shummoogum/Quebec/IBM@IBMCA, <ohiohondo@columbus.rr.com>
cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Subject: RE: Dialer load-threshold question
Wow....... Yeah........ I guess it's been a while since BCRAN..... At
first I was like "128?? You can't do 128k on a B channel!!!"
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122cgcr/
fdial_r/drfd.htm#1018455
That's why I love this group...... It keeps you on your toes.....
Mike W.
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Ram Shummoogum
Sent: Saturday, April 26, 2003 8:52 AM
To: ohiohondo@columbus.rr.com
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: Dialer load-threshold question
The calculation is not based on the bandwidth but the load ( 1-255). The
max is 255
32K is 50% of 64K
and 50% of 255 = 128
Cheers,
RAM
"OhioHondo" <ohiohondo@columbus.rr.com> on 04/26/2003 09:33:50 AM
To: Ram Shummoogum/Quebec/IBM@IBMCA, <ohiohondo@columbus.rr.com>
cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Subject: RE: Dialer load-threshold question
Ram
I believed the load-threshold specifies at what load the 2nd "B" channel
is engaged. An answer of 128 in that case wouldn't make sense.
In other words, if the incoming or outgoing load becomes greater that
XXX, then being up the 2nd "B" channel.
Since only one "B" channel is engaged at first, the greatest load in one
direction can only be 64K. It will never reach 128K.
This should be the same as when we specify a dialer load threshold of 1
to get the 2nd "B" channel to come up right away --- only in this case,
we're waiting until the load reaches 32K!!!
8-)
-----Original Message-----
From: Ram Shummoogum [mailto:rshummoo@ca.ibm.com]
Sent: Saturday, April 26, 2003 9:23 AM
To: ohiohondo@columbus.rr.com
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: Dialer load-threshold question
It is 128.
"OhioHondo" <ohiohondo@columbus.rr.com>@groupstudy.com on 04/26/2003
07:40:37 AM
Please respond to "OhioHondo" <ohiohondo@columbus.rr.com>
Sent by: nobody@groupstudy.com
To: "folivore" <folivore@hotmail.com>, <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
cc:
Subject: RE: Dialer load-threshold question
how about
dialer load-threshold 32 either
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
folivore
Sent: Friday, April 25, 2003 11:05 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Dialer load-threshold question
Hi, Guys:
If a question states: Bring up both B if the traffic exceed 32k on any
direction. Which one is the correct answer? dialer load-threshold 64
either or dialer load-threshold 128 either
I think the second one is correct but nearly all books give me the first
one. Do we need to calculate the load based on 2B?
Thanks
Jim
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu May 01 2003 - 13:36:07 GMT-3