From: j (wkfrktpdy@hotmail.com)
Date: Mon Apr 21 2003 - 10:49:08 GMT-3
Thanks Kashif,
I would just like to make a comment.
on your document, for nbma, you have the command
"frame-relay map ip 1.1.1.2 100 broadcast"
I think ospf will work without the broadcast at the end of frame map
statement, since by using
"neighbor" under router ospf, all updates will be unicast.
Am I correct?
-----Original Message-----
From: Kash [mailto:kash2331@yahoo.com]
Sent: Monday, 21 April 2003 11:29 PM
To: <B3U$/; Volkov, Dmitry (IDS Canada); Teck PhrEAk!!;
wkfrktpdy@hotmail.com
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: ospf over nbma- neighbor statements necessary on which
router
Hi,
I have made a small document on OSPF and FR check it
out maybe it will help and if i have made any mistakes
some one can point them out.
This I have made based on what cisco says on the web.
Kashif
--- <B3U$/ <johnson_liu@corp.giga.net.tw> wrote:
> I see the previous problem in this question, because
> if you have set the 'neighbor' statement under
> router ospf process. It will disappear after
> setting 'ip ospf priority 0' under the interface.
> However, it should not be called 'incompatible' ...
> It should be called 'unnecessarily' after that.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Volkov, Dmitry (IDS Canada) [mailto:dmitry_volkov@ca.ml.com]
> Sent: Monday, April 21, 2003 2:50 AM
> To: 'Teck PhrEAk!!'; wkfrktpdy@hotmail.com
> Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: ospf over nbma- neighbor statements
> necessary on which router
>
>
> I used to put "ip ospf priority 0" under interface
> on spoke - to avoid any possibility of electing
> spoke as DR.
>
> In this case "neighbor" statement doesn't really
> work on spoke.
> It doesn't appear in config even.
> However it works (placing "neighbor" initiate
> sending of 1st unicast hello packet towards to Hub)
> until You reload spoke router . So If You put "ip
> ospf priority 0" on spoke, put "neighbor" on Hub.
>
> I don't know the explanation why "ip ospf priority
> 0" and "neighbor" under ospf process are
> "incompatible"
>
> Dmitry
>
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Teck PhrEAk!!
> [mailto:phreakinphunk@hotmail.com]
> > Sent: Sunday, April 20, 2003 10:52 AM
> > To: wkfrktpdy@hotmail.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: Re: ospf over nbma- neighbor statements
> necessary on
> > which router
> >
> >
> > I recommend u put it on both the hub and
> spoke.....but it
> > works just fine if
> > u put it only on the spoke.....
> >
> >
> > cheers,
> >
> > sumit.
> >
> >
> >
> > >From: "mary john" <wkfrktpdy@hotmail.com>
> > >Reply-To: "mary john" <wkfrktpdy@hotmail.com>
> > >To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > >Subject: ospf over nbma- neighbor statements
> necessary on
> > which router
> > >Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2003 13:29:45 +0000
> > >
> > >To have ospf run over nbma mode in network such
> as
> > frame-relay, is the
> > >"neighbor x.x.x.x" command necessary on both the
> hub and the
> > spoke routers,
> > >or just the spoke? In Solie's book, it's only
> configured on
> > the spoke.
> > >However, CCO documentations say that we need on
> both hub and spoke?
> > >
> >
>
>_________________________________________________________________
> > >MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2
> months FREE*
> > >http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus
> >
> >
> >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu May 01 2003 - 13:35:59 GMT-3