From: Peter van Oene (pvo@usermail.com)
Date: Tue Apr 01 2003 - 15:21:17 GMT-3
At 08:12 AM 4/1/2003 -0800, groupstudy@bekmezian.com wrote:
>Based on my research, there is no such thing as RFC 3509.
>
>http://www.ietf.org/iesg/1rfc_index.txt
>
>To answer your question, those two areas will not exchange routes without
>some kind of redistribution.
>
>Regards,
>
>George Bekmezian
>CCIE# 10704
I am also not aware of a 3509, but the below draft has long discussed
alternatives for non zero ABR functionality. I am not sure if anyone has
code for it however.
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ospf-abr-alt-05.txt
>"Nawaz, Ajaz" <Ajaz.Nawaz@bskyb.com>
>Sent by: nobody@groupstudy.com
>04/01/2003 06:51 AM
>Please respond to
>"Nawaz, Ajaz" <Ajaz.Nawaz@bskyb.com>
>
>
>To
>"'McCallum, Robert'" <Robert.McCallum@let-it-be-thus.com>, "'Ccielab'
>(E-mail)" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>cc
>
>Subject
>RE: OSPF areas
>
>
>
>
>
>
>using one ospf process per abr ?
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: McCallum, Robert [mailto:Robert.McCallum@let-it-be-thus.com]
>Sent: 01 April 2003 13:19
>To: 'Ccielab' (E-mail)
>Subject: OSPF areas
>
>
>Folks,
>
>Just been reading RFC3509 which clearly states that you do not need to
>have
>all ospf router areas attaching to the backbone area i.e. you can attach
>area 1 and area 2 direct and traffic will flow through this link (without
>the use of a virtual link). Has anyone out there actually configured
>this,
>or has anyone found anything on the cisco website relating to this.
>
>
>
>Robert McCallum CCIE #8757
>
>
>.
>
>
>**********************************************************************
>Information in this email is confidential and may be privileged.
>It is intended for the addressee only. If you have received it in error,
>please notify the sender immediately and delete it from your system.
>You should not otherwise copy it, retransmit it or use or disclose its
>contents to anyone.
>Thank you for your co-operation.
>**********************************************************************
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu May 01 2003 - 13:35:44 GMT-3