From: McCallum, Robert (Robert.McCallum@let-it-be-thus.com)
Date: Wed Apr 02 2003 - 06:33:48 GMT-3
http://ring.aist.go.jp/pub/doc/RFC/authors/rfc3509.txt
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter van Oene [mailto:pvo@usermail.com]
> Sent: 01 April 2003 19:21
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: OSPF areas
>
>
> At 08:12 AM 4/1/2003 -0800, groupstudy@bekmezian.com wrote:
> >Based on my research, there is no such thing as RFC 3509.
> >
> >http://www.ietf.org/iesg/1rfc_index.txt
> >
> >To answer your question, those two areas will not exchange
> routes without
> >some kind of redistribution.
> >
> >Regards,
> >
> >George Bekmezian
> >CCIE# 10704
>
> I am also not aware of a 3509, but the below draft has long discussed
> alternatives for non zero ABR functionality. I am not sure
> if anyone has
> code for it however.
>
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ospf-abr-alt-05.txt
>
>
>
>
>
> >"Nawaz, Ajaz" <Ajaz.Nawaz@bskyb.com>
> >Sent by: nobody@groupstudy.com
> >04/01/2003 06:51 AM
> >Please respond to
> >"Nawaz, Ajaz" <Ajaz.Nawaz@bskyb.com>
> >
> >
> >To
> >"'McCallum, Robert'" <Robert.McCallum@let-it-be-thus.com>, "'Ccielab'
> >(E-mail)" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> >cc
> >
> >Subject
> >RE: OSPF areas
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >using one ospf process per abr ?
> >
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: McCallum, Robert [mailto:Robert.McCallum@let-it-be-thus.com]
> >Sent: 01 April 2003 13:19
> >To: 'Ccielab' (E-mail)
> >Subject: OSPF areas
> >
> >
> >Folks,
> >
> >Just been reading RFC3509 which clearly states that you do
> not need to
> >have
> >all ospf router areas attaching to the backbone area i.e.
> you can attach
> >area 1 and area 2 direct and traffic will flow through this
> link (without
> >the use of a virtual link). Has anyone out there actually configured
> >this,
> >or has anyone found anything on the cisco website relating to this.
> >
> >
> >
> >Robert McCallum CCIE #8757
> >
> >
> >.
> >
> >
> >*************************************************************
> *********
> >Information in this email is confidential and may be privileged.
> >It is intended for the addressee only. If you have received
> it in error,
> >please notify the sender immediately and delete it from your system.
> >You should not otherwise copy it, retransmit it or use or
> disclose its
> >contents to anyone.
> >Thank you for your co-operation.
> >*************************************************************
> *********
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu May 01 2003 - 13:35:45 GMT-3