OSPF areas

From: McCallum, Robert (Robert.McCallum@let-it-be-thus.com)
Date: Tue Apr 01 2003 - 09:19:08 GMT-3

• Next message: Nawaz, Ajaz: "RE: Redistribution"
• Previous message: Nishant Sharma \(IT\): "RE: CCIE #11374"
• Next in thread: Nawaz, Ajaz: "RE: OSPF areas"
• Maybe reply: Nawaz, Ajaz: "RE: OSPF areas"
• Maybe reply: McCallum, Robert: "RE: OSPF areas"
• Maybe reply: groupstudy@bekmezian.com: "RE: OSPF areas"
• Maybe reply: OhioHondo: "RE: OSPF areas"
• Maybe reply: groupstudy@bekmezian.com: "RE: OSPF areas"
• Maybe reply: Roberto Giana: "RE: OSPF areas"
• Maybe reply: Peter van Oene: "RE: OSPF areas"
• Maybe reply: McCallum, Robert: "RE: OSPF areas"
• Maybe reply: Peter van Oene: "RE: OSPF areas"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Folks,

Just been reading RFC3509 which clearly states that you do not need to have all ospf router areas attaching to the backbone area i.e. you can attach area 1 and area 2 direct and traffic will flow through this link (without the use of a virtual link). Has anyone out there actually configured this,
or has anyone found anything on the cisco website relating to this.

Robert McCallum CCIE #8757

• Next message: Nawaz, Ajaz: "RE: Redistribution"
• Previous message: Nishant Sharma \(IT\): "RE: CCIE #11374"
• Next in thread: Nawaz, Ajaz: "RE: OSPF areas"
• Maybe reply: Nawaz, Ajaz: "RE: OSPF areas"
• Maybe reply: McCallum, Robert: "RE: OSPF areas"
• Maybe reply: groupstudy@bekmezian.com: "RE: OSPF areas"
• Maybe reply: OhioHondo: "RE: OSPF areas"
• Maybe reply: groupstudy@bekmezian.com: "RE: OSPF areas"
• Maybe reply: Roberto Giana: "RE: OSPF areas"
• Maybe reply: Peter van Oene: "RE: OSPF areas"
• Maybe reply: McCallum, Robert: "RE: OSPF areas"
• Maybe reply: Peter van Oene: "RE: OSPF areas"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu May 01 2003 - 13:35:44 GMT-3