HSRP Timers in msec (maybe OT)

From: Erick B. (erickbe@yahoo.com)
Date: Thu Feb 06 2003 - 20:40:13 GMT-3

• Next message: OhioHondo: "RE: ISDN again - Preventing OSPF traffic from bringing up a"
• Previous message: Yinka Daramola: "Re: ISDN again - Preventing OSPF traffic from bringing up a"
• Next in thread: Chris Home: "Re: HSRP Timers in msec (maybe OT)"
• Maybe reply: Chris Home: "Re: HSRP Timers in msec (maybe OT)"
• Maybe reply: Mike Williams: "RE: HSRP Timers in msec (maybe OT)"
• Maybe reply: Mohammed Al-zubi: "RE: HSRP Timers in msec (maybe OT)"
• Maybe reply: Erick B.: "Re: HSRP Timers in msec (maybe OT)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Has anyone seen any networks where they lowered their
HSRP timers down to a hellotime of 300 msec and hold
of 1 second? this happens to be on redundant 6509 /
MSFCs.

Spanning tree isn't tweaked and if theres a STP issue
it would take Spanning tree longer then 1 sec to
converge anyway so I don't really understand why
someone would lower their timers so low.

Just curious.

• Next message: OhioHondo: "RE: ISDN again - Preventing OSPF traffic from bringing up a"
• Previous message: Yinka Daramola: "Re: ISDN again - Preventing OSPF traffic from bringing up a"
• Next in thread: Chris Home: "Re: HSRP Timers in msec (maybe OT)"
• Maybe reply: Chris Home: "Re: HSRP Timers in msec (maybe OT)"
• Maybe reply: Mike Williams: "RE: HSRP Timers in msec (maybe OT)"
• Maybe reply: Mohammed Al-zubi: "RE: HSRP Timers in msec (maybe OT)"
• Maybe reply: Erick B.: "Re: HSRP Timers in msec (maybe OT)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Mar 01 2003 - 11:06:14 GMT-3