From: Mohammed Al-zubi (mohammed@sulafsolutions.com)
Date: Thu Feb 06 2003 - 22:24:55 GMT-3
Cisco engineers themselves don't recommend this, I had a client that wanted
50ms failover for a specific application and the offial Cisco answer was
that using HSRP for that critical of an application is not wise, we had to
go to a an L2 technology to meet that requirment (Etherchannel on
Riverstones)
Mohammed
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
Mohammed Al-Zubi
VP Professional Services
24 Werner Ave. #21
Daly City, CA 94014
Tel: (650) 438-6384
Fax: (720) 293-4897
Email: mohammed@sulafsolutions.com
Web: www.sulafsolutions.com
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Erick B.
Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 3:40 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: HSRP Timers in msec (maybe OT)
Has anyone seen any networks where they lowered their
HSRP timers down to a hellotime of 300 msec and hold
of 1 second? this happens to be on redundant 6509 /
MSFCs.
Spanning tree isn't tweaked and if theres a STP issue
it would take Spanning tree longer then 1 sec to
converge anyway so I don't really understand why
someone would lower their timers so low.
Just curious.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Mar 01 2003 - 11:06:14 GMT-3