From: Mike Williams (ccie2be@swbell.net)
Date: Thu Feb 06 2003 - 22:11:21 GMT-3
If you're using UplinkFast, then STP convergence should be virtually
instantaneous, so having a low HSRP timer should work fine. (Note I say
should because I don't actually have anything setup with these timers,
etc). See: (watch for wrap)
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk389/tk621/technologies_tech_note09186a
0080094641.shtml#uplink_fast_fail
Mike W.
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Erick B.
Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 5:40 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: HSRP Timers in msec (maybe OT)
Has anyone seen any networks where they lowered their
HSRP timers down to a hellotime of 300 msec and hold
of 1 second? this happens to be on redundant 6509 /
MSFCs.
Spanning tree isn't tweaked and if theres a STP issue
it would take Spanning tree longer then 1 sec to
converge anyway so I don't really understand why
someone would lower their timers so low.
Just curious.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Mar 01 2003 - 11:06:14 GMT-3