Re: HSRP Timers in msec (maybe OT)

From: Chris Home (clarson52@comcast.net)
Date: Thu Feb 06 2003 - 21:30:55 GMT-3


What does spanning tree convergence have to do with HSRP?

 I have set hsrp timers between 300 and 600 msec to get a faster failover
time. What difference does it make if spanning tree has not finished
converging?

----- Original Message -----
From: "Erick B." <erickbe@yahoo.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 6:40 PM
Subject: HSRP Timers in msec (maybe OT)

> Has anyone seen any networks where they lowered their
> HSRP timers down to a hellotime of 300 msec and hold
> of 1 second? this happens to be on redundant 6509 /
> MSFCs.
>
> Spanning tree isn't tweaked and if theres a STP issue
> it would take Spanning tree longer then 1 sec to
> converge anyway so I don't really understand why
> someone would lower their timers so low.
>
> Just curious.
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
> http://mailplus.yahoo.com
> .
.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Mar 01 2003 - 11:06:14 GMT-3