From: Todd Veillette (tveillette@myeastern.com)
Date: Sat Jan 04 2003 - 19:22:21 GMT-3
Correct, but it will work perfectly if the no frame-inarp is
pulled from the physical. Its the only way I know of that
you can change ip's remotely - drop a sub on a different
network, reconnect on the sub and blowout or change
the physical ip.
-TV
----- Original Message -----
From: "Joe Chang" <changjoe@earthlink.net>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Saturday, January 04, 2003 1:17 PM
Subject: Re: _concurrent frame-r physical and one sub-interface
> I tried it myself, this definitely does not work
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Kumar, Senthil" <senthil.kumar@intechnology.co.uk>
> To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Saturday, January 04, 2003 2:43 PM
> Subject: _concurrent frame-r physical and one sub-interface
>
>
> > can i have a frame-relay physical interface configured for
connectivity-a
> > and a new sub-interface under the same physical for connectivity-b.
> >
> > this is a working config, but is this something that cisco accepts if
> > used..any ideas..
> >
> > int s0/0
> > encap frame-relay
> > ip add 100.100.100.1 255.255.255.0
> > ip ospf network point-to-multipoint
> > no frame-inarp
> > frame-relay map ip 100.100.100.2 200 broadcast
> > frame-relay map ip 100.100.100.3 300 broadcast
> > !
> > int s0/0.1
> > encap frame-relay
> > ip ospf net point-to-point
> > ip add 200.200.200.1 255.255.255.252
> > frame-relay interface-dlci 400
> > !
> >
> >
> > ________________________________________________________________________
> > This message has been checked for all known viruses by the
> > CitC Virus Scanning Service powered by SkyLabs. For further information
> visit
> > http://www.citc.it
> >
> > ___
> > .
> .
.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Feb 01 2003 - 07:33:41 GMT-3