From: kym blair (kymblair@hotmail.com)
Date: Sat Jan 04 2003 - 19:50:49 GMT-3
Senthil,
No problem, you can use subinterfaces for some DLCIs and the physical
interface for other DLCIs. This approach is required in some ccie workbook
scenarios, and is acceptable in the Cisco lab. Your config looks fine.
I've used this approach many times, and recreated it today to send you a
guaranteed working config:
interface Serial1
ip address 172.16.100.6 255.255.255.224
encapsulation frame-relay
ip ospf network point-to-multipoint
frame-relay map ip 172.16.100.3 106 broadcast
frame-relay map ip 172.16.100.5 105 broadcast
frame-relay map ip 172.16.100.6 106 broadcast
no frame-relay inverse-arp
!
interface Serial1.1 point-to-point
ip address 172.16.146.6 255.255.255.240
frame-relay interface-dlci 104
HTH, Kym
>From: "Todd Veillette" <tveillette@myeastern.com>
>Reply-To: "Todd Veillette" <tveillette@myeastern.com>
>To: "Joe Chang" <changjoe@earthlink.net>,
><senthil.kumar@intechnology.co.uk>
>CC: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Subject: Re: _concurrent frame-r physical and one sub-interface
>Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2003 17:22:21 -0500
>
>Correct, but it will work perfectly if the no frame-inarp is
>pulled from the physical. Its the only way I know of that
>you can change ip's remotely - drop a sub on a different
>network, reconnect on the sub and blowout or change
>the physical ip.
>
>-TV
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Joe Chang" <changjoe@earthlink.net>
>To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Sent: Saturday, January 04, 2003 1:17 PM
>Subject: Re: _concurrent frame-r physical and one sub-interface
>
>
> > I tried it myself, this definitely does not work
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Kumar, Senthil" <senthil.kumar@intechnology.co.uk>
> > To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > Sent: Saturday, January 04, 2003 2:43 PM
> > Subject: _concurrent frame-r physical and one sub-interface
> >
> >
> > > can i have a frame-relay physical interface configured for
>connectivity-a
> > > and a new sub-interface under the same physical for connectivity-b.
> > >
> > > this is a working config, but is this something that cisco accepts if
> > > used..any ideas..
> > >
> > > int s0/0
> > > encap frame-relay
> > > ip add 100.100.100.1 255.255.255.0
> > > ip ospf network point-to-multipoint
> > > no frame-inarp
> > > frame-relay map ip 100.100.100.2 200 broadcast
> > > frame-relay map ip 100.100.100.3 300 broadcast
> > > !
> > > int s0/0.1
> > > encap frame-relay
> > > ip ospf net point-to-point
> > > ip add 200.200.200.1 255.255.255.252
> > > frame-relay interface-dlci 400
> > > !
> > >
> > >
> > >
>________________________________________________________________________
> > > This message has been checked for all known viruses by the
> > > CitC Virus Scanning Service powered by SkyLabs. For further
>information
> > visit
> > > http://www.citc.it
> > >
> > > ___
> > > .
> > .
>.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Feb 01 2003 - 07:33:41 GMT-3