From: Matthew Poole (matthew.poole@blueyonder.co.uk)
Date: Mon Dec 09 2002 - 13:29:19 GMT-3
Thanks.
I tried the link Goody Goody sent to Janto earlier and it cures it.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk648/tk365/technologies_tech_note09186a0080
093fd9.shtml
I placed a static route to null 0 for each entry that wasn't getting
through.
router rip
redistribute static
ip route 172.16.1.128 255.255.255.224 Null0
ip route 172.16.1.160 255.255.255.224 Null0
ip route 172.16.1.192 255.255.255.224 Null0
ip route 172.16.1.224 255.255.255.224 Null0
It kind of defeats the object of redistributing EIGRP though if I'm just
going to place static routes for every network.
Thanks again and I'll look for the tunnel link.
Mat.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Hal Kurz" <halkurz@hotmail.com>
To: "Matthew Poole" <matthew.poole@blueyonder.co.uk>;
<ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 4:16 PM
Subject: Re: Route Redistribution - Doyle config exercise
> I used tunnels as suggested in another email on this list from earlier
this
> year. If you create a tunnel for each of the different subnet masks that
RIP
> is not picking up, the tunnel will carry those routes between the
> redistribution router and RIP v1.
>
> Anyone else have a suggestion there or care to comment on the use of
> tunnels?
>
> Hal
>
>
>
> Innovative Technology Consultants and Company, Inc.
> 11767 South Dixie Highway #307
> Miami, FL 33156
>
> Office: (305) 235-6587
> Fax: (305) 256-1562
>
> www.itccinc.com
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Matthew Poole" <matthew.poole@blueyonder.co.uk>
> To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 10:08 AM
> Subject: Route Redistribution - Doyle config exercise
>
>
> > Exercise 2, Page 739 - OSPF to RIPv1.
> >
> > The only way I can get this to work is change the mask on RB E1 to /28
(as
> > in part 1.), although the solution clearly states no need!
> >
> > N.B. RB E1 is my S1/1
> > RB E0 is my S1/0
> >
> > The ints on the left are loopbacks with IP OSPF NETWORK PONT_TO_POINT
> >
> > RB routing table -
> > Gateway of last resort is not set
> >
> > 172.16.0.0/16 is variably subnetted, 10 subnets, 3 masks
> > O 172.16.1.160/28 [110/782] via 172.16.1.145, 00:41:32, Serial1/0
> > C 172.16.1.144/28 is directly connected, Serial1/0
> > O 172.16.1.128/28 [110/782] via 172.16.1.145, 00:41:32, Serial1/0
> > R 172.16.2.128/27 [120/1] via 172.16.1.98, 00:00:16, Serial1/1
> > O 172.16.1.224/28 [110/782] via 172.16.1.145, 00:41:32, Serial1/0
> > O 172.16.1.192/28 [110/782] via 172.16.1.145, 00:41:32, Serial1/0
> > R 172.16.2.32/27 [120/1] via 172.16.1.98, 00:00:17, Serial1/1
> > S 172.16.1.0/24 is directly connected, Serial1/0
> > C 172.16.1.96/27 is directly connected, Serial1/1
> > R 172.16.2.64/27 [120/1] via 172.16.1.98, 00:00:17, Serial1/1
> >
> >
> > A Debug IP Rip on RB shows :
> >
> > 03:43:24: RIP: sending v1 update to 255.255.255.255 via Serial1/1
> > (172.16.1.97)
> > 03:43:24: RIP: build update entries - suppressing null update
> >
> > Relevant config on B is :
> >
> > interface Serial1/0
> > ip address 172.16.1.146 255.255.255.240
> > clockrate 128000
> > !
> > interface Serial1/1
> > ip address 172.16.1.97 255.255.255.224
> > clockrate 128000
> >
> > router ospf 1
> > log-adjacency-changes
> > redistribute rip metric 1000000 subnets
> > passive-interface S1/1
> > network 172.16.1.146 0.0.0.0 area 0
> > !
> > router rip
> > redistribute ospf 1 metric 2
> > passive-interface S1/0
> > network 172.16.0.0
> >
> > Any ideas?
> > .
.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jan 17 2003 - 17:21:41 GMT-3