Re: Route Redistribution - Doyle config exercise

From: Bob Sinclair (bsin@cox.net)
Date: Mon Dec 09 2002 - 13:44:32 GMT-3


One additional suggestion:

Rather than creating one tunnel per mask, use a single tunnel with secondary
addresses. Multiple tunnels can be hard to keep track of. Plus, two
tunnels cannot have the same endpoints.

MY 2 cents.

Bob Sinclair
CCIE #10427

----- Original Message -----
From: "Hal Kurz" <halkurz@hotmail.com>
To: "Matthew Poole" <matthew.poole@blueyonder.co.uk>;
<ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 11:16 AM
Subject: Re: Route Redistribution - Doyle config exercise

> I used tunnels as suggested in another email on this list from earlier
this
> year. If you create a tunnel for each of the different subnet masks that
RIP
> is not picking up, the tunnel will carry those routes between the
> redistribution router and RIP v1.
>
> Anyone else have a suggestion there or care to comment on the use of
> tunnels?
>
> Hal
>
>
>
> Innovative Technology Consultants and Company, Inc.
> 11767 South Dixie Highway #307
> Miami, FL 33156
>
> Office: (305) 235-6587
> Fax: (305) 256-1562
>
> www.itccinc.com
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Matthew Poole" <matthew.poole@blueyonder.co.uk>
> To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 10:08 AM
> Subject: Route Redistribution - Doyle config exercise
>
>
> > Exercise 2, Page 739 - OSPF to RIPv1.
> >
> > The only way I can get this to work is change the mask on RB E1 to /28
(as
> > in part 1.), although the solution clearly states no need!
> >
> > N.B. RB E1 is my S1/1
> > RB E0 is my S1/0
> >
> > The ints on the left are loopbacks with IP OSPF NETWORK PONT_TO_POINT
> >
> > RB routing table -
> > Gateway of last resort is not set
> >
> > 172.16.0.0/16 is variably subnetted, 10 subnets, 3 masks
> > O 172.16.1.160/28 [110/782] via 172.16.1.145, 00:41:32, Serial1/0
> > C 172.16.1.144/28 is directly connected, Serial1/0
> > O 172.16.1.128/28 [110/782] via 172.16.1.145, 00:41:32, Serial1/0
> > R 172.16.2.128/27 [120/1] via 172.16.1.98, 00:00:16, Serial1/1
> > O 172.16.1.224/28 [110/782] via 172.16.1.145, 00:41:32, Serial1/0
> > O 172.16.1.192/28 [110/782] via 172.16.1.145, 00:41:32, Serial1/0
> > R 172.16.2.32/27 [120/1] via 172.16.1.98, 00:00:17, Serial1/1
> > S 172.16.1.0/24 is directly connected, Serial1/0
> > C 172.16.1.96/27 is directly connected, Serial1/1
> > R 172.16.2.64/27 [120/1] via 172.16.1.98, 00:00:17, Serial1/1
> >
> >
> > A Debug IP Rip on RB shows :
> >
> > 03:43:24: RIP: sending v1 update to 255.255.255.255 via Serial1/1
> > (172.16.1.97)
> > 03:43:24: RIP: build update entries - suppressing null update
> >
> > Relevant config on B is :
> >
> > interface Serial1/0
> > ip address 172.16.1.146 255.255.255.240
> > clockrate 128000
> > !
> > interface Serial1/1
> > ip address 172.16.1.97 255.255.255.224
> > clockrate 128000
> >
> > router ospf 1
> > log-adjacency-changes
> > redistribute rip metric 1000000 subnets
> > passive-interface S1/1
> > network 172.16.1.146 0.0.0.0 area 0
> > !
> > router rip
> > redistribute ospf 1 metric 2
> > passive-interface S1/0
> > network 172.16.0.0
> >
> > Any ideas?
> > .
> .
.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jan 17 2003 - 17:21:41 GMT-3