From: Erick B. (erickbe@yahoo.com)
Date: Sun Nov 03 2002 - 06:35:42 GMT-3
a dialer map without a phone # will work, also no
dialer-group or dialer-list. This way there is no way
this side can place a call. If remote calls it it will
connect fine and pass data. Only problem is without a
dialer-group and dialer-list the idle-timer will idle
out since nothing is defined to reset it unless you
have recent code and use dialer persistent feature.
--- Nathan Chessin <nchessin@cisco.com> wrote:
> I am trying to have the satellite configured as
> simply as possible. Without
> dialer string, without dialer map. This scenario
> works with dialer
> profiles, but I haven't gotten it to work without
> them.
>
> Nate
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Prashanth [mailto:prashanthcm@yahoo.com]
> > Sent: Saturday, November 02, 2002 5:16 PM
> > To: Nathan Chessin; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: Re: Dynamic Dialer Map
> >
> >
> > Nathan
> >
> > a dialer string can be configured instead of the
> > static dialer map?
> >
> > prashanth
> > --- Nathan Chessin <nchessin@cisco.com> wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > When using ppp encapsulation on both sides of
> the
> > > DDR link, it says that I
> > > should only need a dialer map ip x.x.x.x
> broadcast
> > > <string> on one side of
> > > the link and the other side doesn't need a
> string or
> > > dialer map statement.
> > > However, when testing, I was unable to make the
> > > call.
> > >
> > > At the other end, the show dialer map command
> > > doesn't reveal any mapping.
> > > When I add the static dialer map, the call is
> > > completed and works. Question
> > > is, why doesn't any dynamic mapping take place.
> > > Isn't this necessary for
> > > scenarios not wanting one end of a link to
> initiate
> > > the call?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > >
> > > Nate
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Dec 03 2002 - 07:22:51 GMT-3