From: Darryl Munro (Darryl.Munro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sat Jul 20 2002 - 21:45:30 GMT-3
If you are not able to use static routes is there any other way of doing
this? I only ask this as I have done an ASET lab recently and the question
came up and we had quite lengthy discussion over this point. If the lab
stipulates that you are not allowed to use static routes unless specifically
requested then is it open to interpreting the question and assuming that you
are allowed to use static routes to achieve this if there is no other way to
achieve this.
This is a URL on the Cisco web site that basically says that static's are
the only way to do it.
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/105/52.html
Cheers
-----Original Message-----
From: kym blair [mailto:kymblair@hotmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, 21 July 2002 12:20 p.m.
To: Darryl.Munro@computerland.co.nz; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: Redistrbuting from OSPF to RIP/IGRP
Darryl,
use on R4:
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 X.X.X.X
>From: Darryl Munro <Darryl.Munro@computerland.co.nz>
>Reply-To: Darryl Munro <Darryl.Munro@computerland.co.nz>
>To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: RE: Redistrbuting from OSPF to RIP/IGRP
>Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2002 11:22:16 +1200
>
>Thanks for your feedback Kym. I realised one of my problems was that I had
>not filtered the routes being learnt from OSPF by IGRP back the other way.
>Once I had my distribute-list in place my route tables settled down a
>little
>more, perhaps I should have been a little bit more specific about my
>problem. One other question I have though is when you are trying to set the
>default route in your network when you have only one egress point I am not
>sure how to get the route back into IGRP.
>
>Here is my topo:
>
>R1--------->R2---------->R3---------->R4
> EIGRP OSPF IGRP
>
>I have the default route coming from R1, R2 is redistributing into OSPF, R3
>can see the default route, but when attempting to redistribute into IGRP so
>that R4 can get out of the Internal Network so to speak, I just can't seem
>to get the all zeros route to it. I have tried using the ip default-network
>command on R4 however that just ends up putting an ip route 10.0.0.0
>255.0.0.0 to the network that I specified in the default-network command.
>
>TIA
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: kym blair [mailto:kymblair@hotmail.com]
>Sent: Sunday, 21 July 2002 1:45 a.m.
>To: fangloma@pacific.net.hk; Darryl.Munro@Computerland.co.nz
>Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: Re: Redistrbuting from OSPF to RIP/IGRP
>
>Darryl,
>
>There are a couple methods. The one many people like is to create a second
>OSPF process, redistribute the first ospf process into the second,
>summarize
>
>each non-classful network under the second ospf process, then redistribute
>both ospf processes into RIP/IGRP.
>
>HTH, Kym
>
>
>
>
> >From: Fanglo MA <fangloma@pacific.net.hk>
> >Reply-To: Fanglo MA <fangloma@pacific.net.hk>
> >To: Darryl Munro <Darryl.Munro@computerland.co.nz>
> >CC: Group Study <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> >Subject: Re: Redistrbuting from OSPF to RIP/IGRP
> >Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2002 15:59:03 +0800 (HKT)
> >
> >Would you consider using route-map to direct summary address point to
> >null0 to replace the static route functionality?
> >
> >Regards,
> >Fanglo
> >
> >On Sat, 20 Jul 2002, Darryl Munro wrote:
> >
> > > How is it possible to redistribute from OSPF to IGRP/RIP without using
> > > statics to Null0? I know that the mask needs to be the same as the
> >IGRP/RIP
> > > domain, however is it achievable to do this with area range commands
>and
> > > summary-address's positioned at the right the places in your OSPF
> >domain?
> > > Area range should take care of all of the OSPF inter area routes and
> >summary
> > > address the external addresses from other routing protocols. I just
> >can't
> > > seem to work this one out in my lab. Any suggestions would be
> >appreciated.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > TIA
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Darryl Munro
> > >
> > > CNE, MCSE, CCNP, CCDP, CCEA
> > >
> > > Systems Consultant
> > >
> > > Computerland NZ
> > >
> > > 104-106 Customs St West
> > >
> > > PO Box 3631, Auckland
> > >
> > > Phone: 09 306 8700
> > >
> > > Cell Phone 027 2897786
> > >
> > > Darryl <mailto:darryl.munro@computerland.co.nz> Munro
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > CAUTION: This e-mail message and accompanying data may contain
> >information
> > > that is confidential and subject to privilege. If you are not the
> >intended
> > > recipient, you are notified that any use, dissemination, distribution
>or
> > > copying of this message or data is prohibited. If you have received
> >this
> > > e-mail in error, please notify me immediately and delete all material
> > > pertaining to this e-mail. Ceritas / Computerland will not accept
> >liability
> > > for any loss or damage caused by using any material or attachments
> >contained
> > > in this message. While every best practice has been taken to, no
> >warranty is
> > > made that this material is free from computer virus or other defect.
> > > Ceritas/Computerland's entire liability will be limited to resupplying
> >the
> > > material. Thank you
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:36:38 GMT-3