RE: Redistrbuting from OSPF to RIP/IGRP

From: kym blair (kymblair@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sat Jul 20 2002 - 21:19:59 GMT-3


   
Darryl,

use on R4:

ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 X.X.X.X

>From: Darryl Munro <Darryl.Munro@computerland.co.nz>
>Reply-To: Darryl Munro <Darryl.Munro@computerland.co.nz>
>To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: RE: Redistrbuting from OSPF to RIP/IGRP
>Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2002 11:22:16 +1200
>
>Thanks for your feedback Kym. I realised one of my problems was that I had
>not filtered the routes being learnt from OSPF by IGRP back the other way.
>Once I had my distribute-list in place my route tables settled down a
>little
>more, perhaps I should have been a little bit more specific about my
>problem. One other question I have though is when you are trying to set the
>default route in your network when you have only one egress point I am not
>sure how to get the route back into IGRP.
>
>Here is my topo:
>
>R1--------->R2---------->R3---------->R4
> EIGRP OSPF IGRP
>
>I have the default route coming from R1, R2 is redistributing into OSPF, R3
>can see the default route, but when attempting to redistribute into IGRP so
>that R4 can get out of the Internal Network so to speak, I just can't seem
>to get the all zeros route to it. I have tried using the ip default-network
>command on R4 however that just ends up putting an ip route 10.0.0.0
>255.0.0.0 to the network that I specified in the default-network command.
>
>TIA
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: kym blair [mailto:kymblair@hotmail.com]
>Sent: Sunday, 21 July 2002 1:45 a.m.
>To: fangloma@pacific.net.hk; Darryl.Munro@Computerland.co.nz
>Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: Re: Redistrbuting from OSPF to RIP/IGRP
>
>Darryl,
>
>There are a couple methods. The one many people like is to create a second
>OSPF process, redistribute the first ospf process into the second,
>summarize
>
>each non-classful network under the second ospf process, then redistribute
>both ospf processes into RIP/IGRP.
>
>HTH, Kym
>
>
>
>
> >From: Fanglo MA <fangloma@pacific.net.hk>
> >Reply-To: Fanglo MA <fangloma@pacific.net.hk>
> >To: Darryl Munro <Darryl.Munro@computerland.co.nz>
> >CC: Group Study <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> >Subject: Re: Redistrbuting from OSPF to RIP/IGRP
> >Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2002 15:59:03 +0800 (HKT)
> >
> >Would you consider using route-map to direct summary address point to
> >null0 to replace the static route functionality?
> >
> >Regards,
> >Fanglo
> >
> >On Sat, 20 Jul 2002, Darryl Munro wrote:
> >
> > > How is it possible to redistribute from OSPF to IGRP/RIP without using
> > > statics to Null0? I know that the mask needs to be the same as the
> >IGRP/RIP
> > > domain, however is it achievable to do this with area range commands
>and
> > > summary-address's positioned at the right the places in your OSPF
> >domain?
> > > Area range should take care of all of the OSPF inter area routes and
> >summary
> > > address the external addresses from other routing protocols. I just
> >can't
> > > seem to work this one out in my lab. Any suggestions would be
> >appreciated.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > TIA
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Darryl Munro
> > >
> > > CNE, MCSE, CCNP, CCDP, CCEA
> > >
> > > Systems Consultant
> > >
> > > Computerland NZ
> > >
> > > 104-106 Customs St West
> > >
> > > PO Box 3631, Auckland
> > >
> > > Phone: 09 306 8700
> > >
> > > Cell Phone 027 2897786
> > >
> > > Darryl <mailto:darryl.munro@computerland.co.nz> Munro
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > CAUTION: This e-mail message and accompanying data may contain
> >information
> > > that is confidential and subject to privilege. If you are not the
> >intended
> > > recipient, you are notified that any use, dissemination, distribution
>or
> > > copying of this message or data is prohibited. If you have received
> >this
> > > e-mail in error, please notify me immediately and delete all material
> > > pertaining to this e-mail. Ceritas / Computerland will not accept
> >liability
> > > for any loss or damage caused by using any material or attachments
> >contained
> > > in this message. While every best practice has been taken to, no
> >warranty is
> > > made that this material is free from computer virus or other defect.
> > > Ceritas/Computerland's entire liability will be limited to resupplying
> >the
> > > material. Thank you



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:36:38 GMT-3