Changes of lab=loss of $$

From: Bill Mckenzie (bmckenzie@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Jun 14 2002 - 13:58:26 GMT-3

• Next message: Nijoe Muckom: "San Jose R&S Lab Swap"
• Previous message: steven.j.nelson@xxxxxx: "RE: CCIE Lab changes - Read this"
• Next in thread: Carley, Charles: "RE: Changes of lab=loss of $$"
• Maybe reply: Carley, Charles: "RE: Changes of lab=loss of $$"
• Maybe reply: Troy Rader: "Re: Changes of lab=loss of $$"
• Maybe reply: Ian.C.Stong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx: "RE: Changes of lab=loss of $$"
• Maybe reply: Dan.Thorson@xxxxxxxxxxx: "RE: Changes of lab=loss of $$"
• Maybe reply: CiscoJunkie: "Re: Changes of lab=loss of $$"
• Maybe reply: Manny Gonzalez: "Re: Changes of lab=loss of $$"
• Maybe reply: Kurt Kruegel: "Re: Changes of lab=loss of $$"
• Maybe reply: Church, Chuck: "RE: Changes of lab=loss of $$"
• Maybe reply: Todd Carswell: "Re: Changes of lab=loss of $$"
• Maybe reply: kashif akhtar: "Re: Changes of lab=loss of $$"
• Maybe reply: chenriqu: "RE: Changes of lab=loss of $$"
• Maybe reply: Christopher Supino: "RE: Changes of lab=loss of $$"
• Maybe reply: Phil: "Re: Changes of lab=loss of $$"
• Maybe reply: Michael Breen: "RE: Changes of lab=loss of $$"
• Maybe reply: Tim Ross: "Re: Changes of lab=loss of $$"
• Maybe reply: Prashanth: "Re: Changes of lab=loss of $$"
• Maybe reply: David L Stewart: "Re: Changes of lab=loss of $$"
• Maybe reply: Kurt Kruegel: "Re: Changes of lab=loss of $$"
• Maybe reply: Kleberg, Jason: "RE: Changes of lab=loss of $$"
• Maybe reply: Donald B Johnson Jr: "Re: Changes of lab=loss of $$"
• Maybe reply: Michael Breen: "RE: Changes of lab=loss of $$"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

   
Here's a problem and I think quite a few people would agree with me that
have their lab between October and November 4th. It's almost not worth it to
buy a Cat 5000 or Cisco 3920 for a home lab (even though you could probably
get a little better deal on one right now) because, what happens when you
try to sell it later? No one needs it that is taking their test after Nov.
4th.

I'm just moaning. Has anyone used the 3920 simulation software available?

Also, because by then I'm sure they will have replaced all the Cat 5000's
with the 3550's, does it use the same command set as a 3524 switch?

Thanks in advance for any help,
Bill Mckenzie

• Next message: Nijoe Muckom: "San Jose R&S Lab Swap"
• Previous message: steven.j.nelson@xxxxxx: "RE: CCIE Lab changes - Read this"
• Next in thread: Carley, Charles: "RE: Changes of lab=loss of $$"
• Maybe reply: Carley, Charles: "RE: Changes of lab=loss of $$"
• Maybe reply: Troy Rader: "Re: Changes of lab=loss of $$"
• Maybe reply: Ian.C.Stong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx: "RE: Changes of lab=loss of $$"
• Maybe reply: Dan.Thorson@xxxxxxxxxxx: "RE: Changes of lab=loss of $$"
• Maybe reply: CiscoJunkie: "Re: Changes of lab=loss of $$"
• Maybe reply: Manny Gonzalez: "Re: Changes of lab=loss of $$"
• Maybe reply: Kurt Kruegel: "Re: Changes of lab=loss of $$"
• Maybe reply: Church, Chuck: "RE: Changes of lab=loss of $$"
• Maybe reply: Todd Carswell: "Re: Changes of lab=loss of $$"
• Maybe reply: kashif akhtar: "Re: Changes of lab=loss of $$"
• Maybe reply: chenriqu: "RE: Changes of lab=loss of $$"
• Maybe reply: Christopher Supino: "RE: Changes of lab=loss of $$"
• Maybe reply: Phil: "Re: Changes of lab=loss of $$"
• Maybe reply: Michael Breen: "RE: Changes of lab=loss of $$"
• Maybe reply: Tim Ross: "Re: Changes of lab=loss of $$"
• Maybe reply: Prashanth: "Re: Changes of lab=loss of $$"
• Maybe reply: David L Stewart: "Re: Changes of lab=loss of $$"
• Maybe reply: Kurt Kruegel: "Re: Changes of lab=loss of $$"
• Maybe reply: Kleberg, Jason: "RE: Changes of lab=loss of $$"
• Maybe reply: Donald B Johnson Jr: "Re: Changes of lab=loss of $$"
• Maybe reply: Michael Breen: "RE: Changes of lab=loss of $$"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jul 02 2002 - 08:12:33 GMT-3