From: Nikolay Nikolov (nnikolov@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu May 30 2002 - 15:52:37 GMT-3
This example has a typo.
Check what Cisco says about the same scenario:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/701/45.html#3
-Nick
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Johan Strandloof
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 11:48 AM
To: Lupi, Guy; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: DLSW+ between E and TR?
Thanks,
That was my impression as well - what really puzzeled me was this:
(watch the wrap)
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios121/121cgcr/ibm_
c/bcprt2/bcddlsw.htm#xtocid1133243
Router A only has Ethernet - still a source bridge command....
Ah well - just goes to show you can't completely trust the DocCD, I
guess.
On Thu, 30 May 2002 12:19:44 -0400
"Lupi, Guy" <Guy.Lupi@eurekaggn.com> wrote:
> The source bridge command is only necessary if you have a single router
with
> both ethernet and token ring, and you want them to be able to communicate.
> If the router has only ethernet, it is never necessary to use the source
> bridge command when doing dlsw. Don't forget the bridge-group and dlsw
> bridge-group commands though.
>
> *-----Original Message-----
> *From: Johan Strandloof [mailto:strandloof@telia.com]
> *Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 11:25 AM
> *To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> *Subject: DLSW+ between E and TR?
> *
> *
> *Hi gang,
> *
> *When connecting an Ethernet segment with a remote TR-segment through
> *DLSW+ I'm a bit confused as to the usage of the "source-bridge
> *ring-group"-command.
> *
> *This command is of course a must on the TR-router, but what of the
> *remote Ethernet-router? I've seen examples leading to think
> *that this is
> *mandatory on the remote side as well - even though there is no
> *TR-segment there (isn't the "dlsw bridge-group x"-command enough?)
> *
> *Other examples point to the contrary...
> *
> *Would someone care to clarify?
> *
> *Best regards
> *
> */Johan
> *--
> *Johan Strandloof <strandloof@telia.com>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:59:12 GMT-3