From: John Neiberger (neiby@xxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu May 30 2002 - 14:18:43 GMT-3
Actually, source-bridge ring-group is also
necessary if you're using TR-only or
SDLC-to-TR. The RIF is terminated at the
router and end-hosts on the TR segment see
all remote devices as residing on the ring
number configured using this command.
John
---- On Thu, 30 May 2002, Lupi, Guy
(Guy.Lupi@eurekaggn.com) wrote:
> The source bridge command is only
necessary if you have a single router with
> both ethernet and token ring, and you want
them to be able to communicate.
> If the router has only ethernet, it is
never necessary to use the source
> bridge command when doing dlsw. Don't
forget the bridge-group and dlsw
> bridge-group commands though.
>
> *-----Original Message-----
> *From: Johan Strandloof
[mailto:strandloof@telia.com]
> *Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 11:25 AM
> *To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> *Subject: DLSW+ between E and TR?
> *
> *
> *Hi gang,
> *
> *When connecting an Ethernet segment with
a remote TR-segment through
> *DLSW+ I'm a bit confused as to the usage
of the "source-bridge
> *ring-group"-command.
> *
> *This command is of course a must on the
TR-router, but what of the
> *remote Ethernet-router? I've seen
examples leading to think
> *that this is
> *mandatory on the remote side as well -
even though there is no
> *TR-segment there (isn't the "dlsw
bridge-group x"-command enough?)
> *
> *Other examples point to the contrary...
> *
> *Would someone care to clarify?
> *
> *Best regards
> *
> */Johan
> *--
> *Johan Strandloof <strandloof@telia.com>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:59:12 GMT-3