From: Lupi, Guy (Guy.Lupi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu May 30 2002 - 14:23:05 GMT-3
Correct, I should have included that, I was addressing the ethernet portion
of the question.
*-----Original Message-----
*From: John Neiberger [mailto:neiby@ureach.com]
*Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 1:19 PM
*To: Lupi, Guy; 'Johan Strandloof'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
*Subject: Re: RE: DLSW+ between E and TR?
*
*
*Actually, source-bridge ring-group is also
*necessary if you're using TR-only or
*SDLC-to-TR. The RIF is terminated at the
*router and end-hosts on the TR segment see
*all remote devices as residing on the ring
*number configured using this command.
*
*John
*
*---- On Thu, 30 May 2002, Lupi, Guy
*(Guy.Lupi@eurekaggn.com) wrote:
*
*> The source bridge command is only
*necessary if you have a single router with
*> both ethernet and token ring, and you want
*them to be able to communicate.
*> If the router has only ethernet, it is
*never necessary to use the source
*> bridge command when doing dlsw. Don't
*forget the bridge-group and dlsw
*> bridge-group commands though.
*>
*> *-----Original Message-----
*> *From: Johan Strandloof
*[mailto:strandloof@telia.com]
*> *Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 11:25 AM
*> *To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
*> *Subject: DLSW+ between E and TR?
*> *
*> *
*> *Hi gang,
*> *
*> *When connecting an Ethernet segment with
*a remote TR-segment through
*> *DLSW+ I'm a bit confused as to the usage
*of the "source-bridge
*> *ring-group"-command.
*> *
*> *This command is of course a must on the
*TR-router, but what of the
*> *remote Ethernet-router? I've seen
*examples leading to think
*> *that this is
*> *mandatory on the remote side as well -
*even though there is no
*> *TR-segment there (isn't the "dlsw
*bridge-group x"-command enough?)
*> *
*> *Other examples point to the contrary...
*> *
*> *Would someone care to clarify?
*> *
*> *Best regards
*> *
*> */Johan
*> *--
*> *Johan Strandloof <strandloof@telia.com>
*>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:59:12 GMT-3