DLSW+ between E and TR?

From: Johan Strandloof (strandloof@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu May 30 2002 - 12:24:54 GMT-3

• Next message: Erick B.: "Re: Layer 2 trace"
• Previous message: Bola Adegbonmire: "FW: OSPF & RIP Red. With rip longer mask"
• Next in thread: Lupi, Guy: "RE: DLSW+ between E and TR?"
• Maybe reply: Lupi, Guy: "RE: DLSW+ between E and TR?"
• Maybe reply: Johan Strandloof: "Re: DLSW+ between E and TR?"
• Maybe reply: Nikolay Nikolov: "RE: DLSW+ between E and TR?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

   
Hi gang,

When connecting an Ethernet segment with a remote TR-segment through
DLSW+ I'm a bit confused as to the usage of the "source-bridge
ring-group"-command.

This command is of course a must on the TR-router, but what of the
remote Ethernet-router? I've seen examples leading to think that this is
mandatory on the remote side as well - even though there is no
TR-segment there (isn't the "dlsw bridge-group x"-command enough?)

Other examples point to the contrary...

Would someone care to clarify?

Best regards

/Johan

--
Johan Strandloof <strandloof@telia.com>

• Next message: Erick B.: "Re: Layer 2 trace"
• Previous message: Bola Adegbonmire: "FW: OSPF & RIP Red. With rip longer mask"
• Next in thread: Lupi, Guy: "RE: DLSW+ between E and TR?"
• Maybe reply: Lupi, Guy: "RE: DLSW+ between E and TR?"
• Maybe reply: Johan Strandloof: "Re: DLSW+ between E and TR?"
• Maybe reply: Nikolay Nikolov: "RE: DLSW+ between E and TR?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:59:12 GMT-3