RE: When to use "no auto-summary"

From: Emmanuel Oppong (e-oppong@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Mar 18 2002 - 13:49:28 GMT-3

• Next message: Park, Peter: "RE: Igrp metric calculation"
• Previous message: Bauer, Rick: "RE: RE: Complimentary gas masks?"
• Maybe in reply to: Jon O'Nan: "When to use "no auto-summary""
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

   
For RIP v2 and EIGRP always use "no auto-summary".
If a BGP router is doing redistribution, always use "no auto-summary".

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Jon O'Nan
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 7:27 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: When to use "no auto-summary"

Can anyone enlighten me on a general rule when using no auto-summary in
different routing protocols? I am aware of the implications of large
routing tables when not summarizing, what I would like to know is if you
are not concerned about processor or memory, is it ok to always use "no
auto-summary"?

Thanks
Jon

• Next message: Park, Peter: "RE: Igrp metric calculation"
• Previous message: Bauer, Rick: "RE: RE: Complimentary gas masks?"
• Maybe in reply to: Jon O'Nan: "When to use "no auto-summary""
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:57:12 GMT-3