When to use "no auto-summary"

From: Jon O'Nan (jononan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Mar 18 2002 - 12:26:56 GMT-3

• Next message: Lupi, Guy: "DLSW and Source Bridge"
• Previous message: Logan, Harold: "RE: "You Can't Subnet Time""
• Next in thread: Bruno Poussard: "RE: When to use "no auto-summary""
• Maybe reply: Bruno Poussard: "RE: When to use "no auto-summary""
• Maybe reply: MADMAN: "Re: When to use "no auto-summary""
• Maybe reply: Emmanuel Oppong: "RE: When to use "no auto-summary""
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

   
Can anyone enlighten me on a general rule when using no auto-summary in
different routing protocols? I am aware of the implications of large
routing tables when not summarizing, what I would like to know is if you
are not concerned about processor or memory, is it ok to always use "no
auto-summary"?

Thanks
Jon

• Next message: Lupi, Guy: "DLSW and Source Bridge"
• Previous message: Logan, Harold: "RE: "You Can't Subnet Time""
• Next in thread: Bruno Poussard: "RE: When to use "no auto-summary""
• Maybe reply: Bruno Poussard: "RE: When to use "no auto-summary""
• Maybe reply: MADMAN: "Re: When to use "no auto-summary""
• Maybe reply: Emmanuel Oppong: "RE: When to use "no auto-summary""
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:57:12 GMT-3