From: Bob Sinclair (bsin@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Feb 21 2002 - 16:56:01 GMT-3
I am getting the same negative results with RIP default route being automatical
ly distributed. Tried 0/0 to interface and 0/0 to next hop. RIP is not report
ing this result to neighbor RIP routers. Only auto-advertised RIP default that
works for me is default-network. I am running 12.1(11).
----- Original Message -----
From: "Steven Weber" <itweber@earthlink.net>
To: "Tshon" <tshon@netzero.net>; "George Spahl" <georges@iglou.com>
Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 2:04 PM
Subject: Re: IP RIP default-routing
> what are saying is correct however you must use the outgoing interface
> instead of next hop if you want this to work.
> Try it and let us know how it goes.
> Steve
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tshon" <tshon@netzero.net>
> To: "George Spahl" <georges@iglou.com>
> Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 1:33 PM
> Subject: Re: IP RIP default-routing
>
>
> > George I am not able to confirm in any other ios, but I have received
> > the same.
> >
> > George Spahl wrote:
> >
> > >Greetings,
> > >
> > >I've long been under the impression that by simply adding a static 0/0
> > >route that RIP would automatically include it in outgoing routing
> > >updates, however I'm only able to make that happen by "redistributing
> > >static". (Default information originate works fine also). I've reduced
> > >it to a very simple config but get the same results. Also, the network
> > >that the 0/0 route points to is in RIP as well (if that makes a
> > >difference. Has the behavior changed for this (or maybe never behaved
> > >this way at all)? Version is 12.1. Didn't expect to get hung up on IP
> > >RIP...
> > >
> > >George
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 20 2002 - 13:46:29 GMT-3