From: George Spahl (g.spahl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Feb 21 2002 - 18:05:36 GMT-3
Seems to get the same results whether it's using a next-hop address or
outbound interface. I did see a bug that looked similar but it only
happened when you also had "ip default-network" configured according to
the bug report. Better to catch this change in behavior (bug?) now than
during the lab I suppose. By the way, I'm using 12.1.9 on 2500s to test
this.
George
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Steven Weber
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 2:04 PM
To: Tshon; George Spahl
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: IP RIP default-routing
what are saying is correct however you must use the outgoing interface
instead of next hop if you want this to work.
Try it and let us know how it goes.
Steve
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tshon" <tshon@netzero.net>
To: "George Spahl" <georges@iglou.com>
Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 1:33 PM
Subject: Re: IP RIP default-routing
> George I am not able to confirm in any other ios, but I have received
> the same.
>
> George Spahl wrote:
>
> >Greetings,
> >
> >I've long been under the impression that by simply adding a static
0/0
> >route that RIP would automatically include it in outgoing routing
> >updates, however I'm only able to make that happen by "redistributing
> >static". (Default information originate works fine also). I've
reduced
> >it to a very simple config but get the same results. Also, the
network
> >that the 0/0 route points to is in RIP as well (if that makes a
> >difference. Has the behavior changed for this (or maybe never
behaved
> >this way at all)? Version is 12.1. Didn't expect to get hung up on
IP
> >RIP...
> >
> >George
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 20 2002 - 13:46:29 GMT-3