From: Frank Liang (liangfrank@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sat Feb 03 2001 - 04:53:50 GMT-3
Nodir,
Let me try to answer your question. Please correct me if I am wrong.
"set ip next-hop" in the policy routing only work when the next hop ip
address is the address directly connect to the policy-routed router. It can
not be any ip address not directly connected such as loopback int.
In this case, it will not do any good to load balancing.
Frank
>From: Nodir Nazarov <nodir@datatone.com>
>Reply-To: Nodir Nazarov <nodir@datatone.com>
>To: Frank Liang <liangfrank@hotmail.com>
>CC: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: Re: policy routing with load balancing
>Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 13:15:14 -0500 (EST)
>
>Thanks everyone who responded however I am little confused with "ip
>next-hop".
>
>when I do "set ip next-hop" this is what I got:
>
>............
>2d04h: IP: s=S.S.S.S (FastEthernet0/0.1), d=D.D.D.D, len 84, FIB policy
>match
>2d04h: CEF-IP-POLICY: fib for address N.N.N.N is with flag 0
>2d04h: IP: s=S.S.S.S (FastEthernet0/0.1), d=D.D.D.D, len 84, FIB policy
>rejected - normal forwarding
>............
>
>When I do "set interface" with SAME EXACT ACL I got:
>............
>2d04h: IP: s=S.S.S.S (FastEthernet0/0.1), d=D.D.D.D, len 84, FIB policy
>match
>2d04h: IP: s=S.S.S.S (FastEthernet0/0.1), d=D.D.D.D (Serial2/0/16 :0), len
>84, FIB policy routed all
>...........
>
>Tried to disable CEF - "ip next-hop" didn't work either. Does it make
>difference how "next-hop" is learned when you do policy routing ?
>
>Nodir
>
>
>
>
>On Fri, 2 Feb 2001, Frank Liang wrote:
>
> > If the first interface specified with the set interface command is down,
>the
> > optionally specified interfaces are tried in turn.
> >
> > I understand that the second interface is used as backup, not load
> > balancing.
> >
> > Frank
> >
> >
> > >From: Nodir Nazarov <nodir@datatone.com>
> > >Reply-To: Nodir Nazarov <nodir@datatone.com>
> > >To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > >Subject: policy routing with load balancing
> > >Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 10:45:26 -0500 (EST)
> > >
> > >Hello, The Group !
> > >
> > >How can I configure more than 1 "set interface" in route-maps for
>policy
> > >routing so that outgoing traffic would be load balanced ? I did
> > >
> > >route-map balance permit 110
> > > match ip address 171
> > > set interface Serial2/0/16:0 Serial2/0/17:0
> > >!
> > >
> > >But traffic matching ACL 171 goes only through first configured
>interface.
> > >What is the purpose of having more than one interface statements in
>"set"?
> > >
> > >Nodir
> > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:28:34 GMT-3