From: Nodir Nazarov (nodir@xxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sat Feb 03 2001 - 02:03:17 GMT-3
Thank you Frank !
Then how do people use policy routing on 2 or more unnumbered serial
interfaces ?
Nodir
On Sat, 3 Feb 2001, Frank Liang wrote:
> Nodir,
> Let me try to answer your question. Please correct me if I am wrong.
> "set ip next-hop" in the policy routing only work when the next hop ip
> address is the address directly connect to the policy-routed router. It can
> not be any ip address not directly connected such as loopback int.
> In this case, it will not do any good to load balancing.
>
> Frank
>
>
> >From: Nodir Nazarov <nodir@datatone.com>
> >Reply-To: Nodir Nazarov <nodir@datatone.com>
> >To: Frank Liang <liangfrank@hotmail.com>
> >CC: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> >Subject: Re: policy routing with load balancing
> >Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 13:15:14 -0500 (EST)
> >
> >Thanks everyone who responded however I am little confused with "ip
> >next-hop".
> >
> >when I do "set ip next-hop" this is what I got:
> >
> >............
> >2d04h: IP: s=S.S.S.S (FastEthernet0/0.1), d=D.D.D.D, len 84, FIB policy
> >match
> >2d04h: CEF-IP-POLICY: fib for address N.N.N.N is with flag 0
> >2d04h: IP: s=S.S.S.S (FastEthernet0/0.1), d=D.D.D.D, len 84, FIB policy
> >rejected - normal forwarding
> >............
> >
> >When I do "set interface" with SAME EXACT ACL I got:
> >............
> >2d04h: IP: s=S.S.S.S (FastEthernet0/0.1), d=D.D.D.D, len 84, FIB policy
> >match
> >2d04h: IP: s=S.S.S.S (FastEthernet0/0.1), d=D.D.D.D (Serial2/0/16 :0), len
> >84, FIB policy routed all
> >...........
> >
> >Tried to disable CEF - "ip next-hop" didn't work either. Does it make
> >difference how "next-hop" is learned when you do policy routing ?
> >
> >Nodir
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >On Fri, 2 Feb 2001, Frank Liang wrote:
> >
> > > If the first interface specified with the set interface command is down,
> >the
> > > optionally specified interfaces are tried in turn.
> > >
> > > I understand that the second interface is used as backup, not load
> > > balancing.
> > >
> > > Frank
> > >
> > >
> > > >From: Nodir Nazarov <nodir@datatone.com>
> > > >Reply-To: Nodir Nazarov <nodir@datatone.com>
> > > >To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > > >Subject: policy routing with load balancing
> > > >Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 10:45:26 -0500 (EST)
> > > >
> > > >Hello, The Group !
> > > >
> > > >How can I configure more than 1 "set interface" in route-maps for
> >policy
> > > >routing so that outgoing traffic would be load balanced ? I did
> > > >
> > > >route-map balance permit 110
> > > > match ip address 171
> > > > set interface Serial2/0/16:0 Serial2/0/17:0
> > > >!
> > > >
> > > >But traffic matching ACL 171 goes only through first configured
> >interface.
> > > >What is the purpose of having more than one interface statements in
> >"set"?
> > > >
> > > >Nodir
> > > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:28:34 GMT-3