RE: CCIE Design Written

From: Michael E. Flannagan (mflannag@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sat Feb 03 2001 - 01:25:32 GMT-3


   
Well, the only way that they could make it as challenging as other CCIE
Written exams was to make it very broad since, by definition, design work
is fairly 'high level' (ie, not deep).

My $.02 worth is that it was easier than the R/S written, but what do I
know? :-)

 ------------------------------------------------------------
    C i s c o S y s t e m s Michael E. Flannagan
         | | Network Consulting Engineer
        ||| ||| Research Triangle Park, NC
      ||||||| ||||||| (919) 392-4550
  .:|||||||||||:.:|||||||||||:. mflannag@cisco.com
 ------------------------------------------------------------

On Fri, 2 Feb 2001, Bruce Williams wrote:

> I agree that they made it incredibly hard because it seems like it covered
> design for Routing and Switching, WAN Switching and ISP Dial all in one
> exam. I took it in December and got a 50. I might give it another shot when
> it comes back.
>
> Bruce
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mask Of Zorro [mailto:ciscokid00@hotmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, February 02, 2001 8:06 PM
> To: tniedens@cisco.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: CCIE Design Written
>
>
>
> The written will be taken offline soon - Feb 15th I think, for a
> revision.
>
> Nobody is passing this thing. There are currently 5 people in the queue
> for
> the lab when it re-opens.
>
> They made this thing rediculously difficult... It should be a bit easier
>
> when it reappears, probably late spring or early summer.
>
> Z
>
>
> >From: "Travis Niedens" <tniedens@cisco.com>
> >Reply-To: "Travis Niedens" <tniedens@cisco.com>
> >To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> >Subject: CCIE Design Written
> >Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 15:38:49 -0800
> >
> >All,
> >
> >Any clues how to study for this one ? I took it and got a 48, needed a
> 60.
> >Covered a lot more than the R/S did. Any help would be appreciated.
> >
> >Thanks,
> >
> >Travis
> >



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:28:34 GMT-3