Re: policy routing with load balancing

From: Les Hardin (hardinl@xxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Feb 02 2001 - 14:17:46 GMT-3


   
I would think you would use the set next-hop instead of set interface, and
let normal routing take care of the load balancing.

Les ($0.02)

At 10:45 AM 2/2/2001 -0500, Nodir Nazarov wrote:

>Hello, The Group !
>
>How can I configure more than 1 "set interface" in route-maps for policy
>routing so that outgoing traffic would be load balanced ? I did
>
>route-map balance permit 110
> match ip address 171
> set interface Serial2/0/16:0 Serial2/0/17:0
>!
>
>But traffic matching ACL 171 goes only through first configured interface.
>What is the purpose of having more than one interface statements in "set"?
>
>Nodir
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:28:34 GMT-3